NAMI SCC Website

 

 

 

 

 

Home
Phone Nos.
Links
Search
Advocacy
Editorial
Experiences
News
Newsletters
People
Recovery
Research
Santa Cruz
Site map
Guest Book

 

 

 

Children's Mental Health Site of the Month

 

 

 

 

California AB 1421 - Governor Signs Involuntary Confinement Bill

 

CALIFORNIA UCP LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
SEPTEMBER 29, 2002 - Sunday morning

Governor Signs AB 1421 That Authorizes Mental Health Involuntary Treatment Pilot Programs - No Action On Budget Trailer Bills

Governor Davis signed into law on Saturday (September 28) AB 1421 by Assemblywoman Helen Thomson (D-Davis) a measure relating to involuntary mental health treatments pilot projects. The bill, known as "Laura's Law" after 19-year old Laura Wilcox, a Nevada County (in California) worker who was shot to death inside the county mental health office by a person with mental illness, was very controversial with  mental health advocates and organizations sharply divided on the issue.

There is still no reported actions taken by the Governor (as of Sunday morning
September 29) on several major bills, including AB 1907 by Assemblyman Dick Dickerson (R-Redding) relating to special education funding; AB 925 by Assemblywoman Dion Aroner (D-Berkeley) relating to removing barriers to employment for people with disabilities, and several controversial measures relating to farmworkers. In addition, the Governor has not yet reported any actions on the remaining budget related bills ("budget trailer bills") still pending - including those impacting people with disabilities, in-home supportive services, Medi-Cal, mental health.

The Governor has until Monday evening (11:59 PM) September 30, to sign, veto or allow bills to become law without his signature. The Governor can also line item (reduce appropriations) of certain measures. There are about 400 or so bills left for him to consider.  California UCP Legislative Updates will be issued over the weekend and Monday as actions by the Governor are available. A special report on the budget trailer bills will be issued once the Governor has taken action on the

BACKGROUND ON AB 1421 - MENTAL HEALTH/INVOLUNTARY TREATMENT
AUTHOR: Assemblywoman Helen Thomson (D-Davis)
MOST CURRENT STATUS: APPROVED by Governor on 9/28/02.(Chapter number not available - no report yet from Secretary of State)
NEXT STEPS: Takes effect January 1, 2003.
WHAT THIS BILL DOES (Reflects Version Sent To Governor): Enacts the Assisted
Outpatient Treatment Demonstration Project Act of 2002, which would create an assisted outpatient treatment program for any person who is suffering from a mental disorder and meets certain criteria.
* Would operate in counties that choose to provide the services.
* The Demonstration Project would end on January 1, 2008.
* The program involves the delivery of community based care by multidisciplinary teams of mental health professionals with staff-to-client ratios of not more than 1 to 10, and additional services, for persons with the most persistent and severe mental illness.
* Specifies requirements for the petition alleging the necessity of treatment, various rights of the person who is the subject of the petition, and hearing procedures.
* Provides for settlement agreements as an alternative to the hearing process. * Provides that if the person who is the subject of the petition fails to comply with outpatient treatment, despite efforts to solicit compliance, a licensed mental health treatment provider may request that the person be placed under a 72-hour hold based on an involuntary commitment.
* Requires each county operating an outpatient treatment program to provide data to the Department of Mental Health, with a report to the Legislature.
IMPACT TO PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES/MENTAL HEALTH & FAMILIES: Yes - very significant direct impact for people in those counties that choose to implement a demonstration project. This measure sharply divided mental health advocates and organizations.
IMPACT TO VENDORS/PROVIDERS/DIRECT CARE STAFF: Uncertain - If the bill is approved, uncertain direct impact to those providers in counties that choose to participate in the demonstration project.
IMPACT ON STATE IMPLEMENTATION OF OLMSTEAD DECISION: Significant - though there is divided opinion on whether this bill helps or hurts implementation.
 

Earlier Stories & Background

Update on California AB 1421 Involuntary commitment bill in the 2002 legislative session.

NOTE: If you would like to get on the UCP Update distribution (and conversely, get off of it) please send an email with that request to: martyomoto@rcip.com. Please allow some time to be removed from the list (it takes time to delete names from distribution listing). Additions can be added immediately.  Please also send announcements of meetings, etc.  if you would like it reported. Please feel free to forward or copy this (just be nice and give some attribution). Thanks!

FOR MORE INFORMATION
Marty Omoto, Legislative Director
CA Coalition of United Cerebral Palsy Associations
1225 8th Street Suite 480 Sacramento, CA 95814
916/446-3204  FAX: 916/446-3206 email: martyomoto@rcip.com
Coalition Chair: Michael Williams (UCP of the Golden Gate)
Immediate Past Chair: Ron Cohen (UCP LA and Ventura Counties

 

Earlier Stories & Background

Update on California AB 1421 Involuntary commitment bill in the 2002 legislative session.

 

Home Phone Nos. Links Search Advocacy Editorial Experiences News Newsletters People Recovery Research Santa Cruz Site map Guest Book

Opinions expressed in this web site do not necessarily reflect the views of NAMI Santa Cruz County, NAMI California or any affiliated organizations.  We attempt to present a balanced perspective on issues by presenting multiple viewpoints.

Copyright 2004, 2005 National Alliance for the Mentally Ill Santa Cruz County, All Rights Reserved.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted (©) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml  If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.