NAMI SCC Website

 

 

 

 

 

Home
Phone Nos.
Links
Search
Advocacy
Editorial
Experiences
News
Newsletters
People
Recovery
Research
Santa Cruz
Site map
Guest Book

 

 

 

Children's Mental Health Site of the Month

 

 

 

 

Harassment of Alternative Non-Drug Based

Treatment in Australia

I just e-mailed this list a note I sent to an Australian researcher, complaining about how his he is experimenting on youth by giving them powerful neuroleptic psychiatric drugs BEFORE they have even been diagnosed "schizophrenic."

The very next e-mail I dealt with was from a totally different Australian. She is involved in non-drug alternatives for people labeled with "schizophrenia." AND THE POLICE JUST VISITED HER related to a complaint about her work from the local medical board!

You can see her web site here: http://www.jungcircle.com/Schizophrenia.html

Feel free to forward.

Below is my e-mail to this non-drug alternative practitioner asking for ways our members can help. AT BOTTOM is her e-mail to police complaining about their visit yesterday.

- David Oaks

David Oaks, Executive Director
MindFreedom Support Coalition International
454 Willamette, Suite 216 - POB 11284
Eugene, OR 97440-3484 USA
 

horizontal rule


To: nathair@bigblue.net.au
From: MindFreedom Support Coalition International
<oaks@mindfreedom.org>
Subject: what can we do to help?
Cc:
Bcc:
X-Attachments:

I was saddened to see the below letter...

What can we do to help? I wish there was an easy e-mail address and/or fax number or something people could make a complaint to.

Also, I looked in database and it's very strange... you're not a member yet! What's your postal address, let me send you a copy of our newsjournal. Then join! Don't let money keep you from joining. People can join for any amount. But it's about building STRENGTH IN NUMBERS, UNITED so that we can stand together!!!!

Please e-mail back soon, I'd like to tell several hundred members some easy steps they can take to complain about below.

And in meantime I'm e-mailing you a note I just sent to another Australian researcher, just moments ago... what a coincidence?

- David

 

horizontal rule


30 December 2002

ATTN: Police Complaints Authority
GPO Box 464
ADELAIDE SA 5000


Dear SA Police

I wish to formally complain about the recent (unannounced) visit of three police officers to my St Peters residence (on Sunday 29 December, 2002), in response to unsubstantiated complaints voiced to the Police by the SA Medical Board (with whom I have nothing to do). The three officers included Greg Charlton and another officer who produced a search warrant. At the time, I was alone, in my pyjamas and enjoying a peaceful listen to The Lord of the Rings radio plays. After their disturbing interruption, the officers eventually confiscated a folder containing master copies of publications which were recently made available at the first Australian Conference (which I convened) on 'Therapeutic Alternatives to Psychiatry and Hospitals for Acute Personal Crises'. For further information on this 'practical vision for genuine mental health reform', please visit www.jungcircle.com/temenos.html

Allow me to say that I do not appreciate being visited by members of the 'Criminal Investigation Branch' when I have committed no crime but have, rather, given enormous time, care and energy (without pay) to helping often fragile and anguished members of the community, many of whom members of the Medical Board have (by sufferers' accounts) traumatised, harassed, or otherwise failed to help. My complaint is therefore directed not so much to the officers concerned (who were, by their accounts, 'merely doing their job'), as it is aimed at the Medical Board itself. Apparently, the latter have accused me of presenting myself as a 'medical doctor' in pamphlets which have been made freely available to the public. As these materials and all my online and international publications confirm, I have done nothing of the sort but have, on the contrary, represented myself only as a 'Jungian', or 'psychiatric therapist' (which I am legally entitled to do). I am also entitled to use the prefix 'Dr', since I have a Doctorate in the field of Jungian psychology.

The Medical Board are therefore, I suggest, ethically guilty of harassment and slander, and of trying to obstruct the valued community work I and my colleagues do. (Mr Charlton, incidentally, invited me to provide him with a recorded statement, which I sensibly declined to do. As I stated to him ad nauseum, I have never advertized myself as a 'medical doctor'. What further 'statement' needs to be made? I would further suggest that the onus is on Mr Charlton and/or the Medical Board to produce evidence of the Board's defamatory allegation.)

Surely you can concede that since I (like many others) do not view depression, schizophrenia, or anything else that is labelled as 'mental illness' as (biologic) 'medical' problems, it would be stupid, self-contradictory and irrelevant for me to put myself forward as a 'medical' GP? Instead, I view all so-called 'mental illness' from a wholistic perspective, which involves responding to individual needs in ways that address both psychospiritual and physical needs. While I focus on the former, for the (complementary) latter I sometimes refer folk to caring GPs and other practitioners who practice natural and/or 'nutritional medicine'. Two of the officers who visited (including Mr Charlton) claimed to have read the pamphlets concerned and other material published on my website. They would therefore surely have been aware that I nowhere broadcast myself as 'medical doctor'. Why, then, did they feel obliged to respond to the Medical Board's unfounded accusation?

It doesn't take a genius to concede that the Medical Board might feel threatened by a credible person working toward the de-medicalization of 'mental illness', the re-empowerment and defence of the human rights of sufferers, and the provision of reputable information on safe alternatives to coercive 'medical' treatment and toxic 'medical' drugs. Might I therefore suggest that in future you bear these possible agendas in mind, should you be asked to respond to further Medical Board 'complaints'? Please bear in mind, too, that we are aiming to help you (and the 'medical' profession) by working toward reforms that would enable persons in acute crisis to be cared for (if they wish) from the start by (non-'medical') residential crisis care workers, instead of by police, 'medical' personnel, chemical restraints and hospitals.

The (mainly voluntary) crisis help work I do is demanding, difficult, challenging, highly rewarding and (often) exhausting and I would appreciate your support. You could perhaps help here by (for starters) responding to this complaint against the Medical Board. In fairness, perhaps the same three officers could be asked to visit (unannounced, on a Sunday arvo) the homes of members of the Medical Board and search their premises for 'relevant' material(?) After all, the work we do includes liaising with solicitors and the Government to help outlaw the human rights abuse and coercive 'medical' treatment which is inflicted on many innocent Australians by members of the Medical Board who endorse the forced 'treatment' (with toxic drugs) of persons who are deemed to be 'mentally ill'. I suggest, in other words, that the Police turn their attention to investigating this massive human rights abuse issue, instead of responding to unproven accusations voiced by the Medical Board. (You claim, after all, to be 'leading the way to a safer community'.)

Finally, the public have a moral right to the information we make available, in order to be informed and able to choose for themselves. Any suggestion to the contrary (i.e. a belief that the public should be provided with only biomedical views), is clearly a breach of the right to free speech and an ethical breach of the public's right to be informed. In this sense, I'm wondering why the Police see fit to be involved in what is not essentially a criminal matter, but rather a difference of opinion about what 'mental illness' is how best to respond to it? The Medical Board are, of course, entitled to their opinion. My views, however, reflect the concerns, fears, hopes and needs of a growing number of Australians who do not view their personal crises and normal problems in living as 'medical' problems requiring 'medical' intervention. I ask that you be openminded and compassionate enough to respect their views (which I aim to represent), samples of which I would be happy to provide. (See, for example, testimonies included in the enclosed yellow brochure.)

Please forward copies of this letter and attached material to Greg Charlton and the two officers who accompanied him. I would also appreciate a response in writing to this complaint (against the Medical Board) at your earliest convenience. Last but not least, I would be grateful if you would promptly return the confiscated folder, since we repeatedly use the master copies it contains.

Yours sincerely

(Dr) Maureen B. Roberts BSc, BA(Hons), PhD
Jungian Psychiatric Therapist
Director: Schizophrenia Drug-free Crisis Centre [Australia]
Cc:
Enzo Fardone [Barrister/Solicitor]                  

Last Updated on 04/14/04   webmaster@namiscc.org

 

Home Phone Nos. Links Search Advocacy Editorial Experiences News Newsletters People Recovery Research Santa Cruz Site map Guest Book

Opinions expressed in this web site do not necessarily reflect the views of NAMI Santa Cruz County, NAMI California or any affiliated organizations.  We attempt to present a balanced perspective on issues by presenting multiple viewpoints.

Copyright 2004, 2005 National Alliance for the Mentally Ill Santa Cruz County, All Rights Reserved.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted (©) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml  If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.