NAMI SCC Website

 

 

 

 

 

Home
Phone Nos.
Links
Search
Advocacy
Editorial
Experiences
News
Newsletters
People
Recovery
Research
Santa Cruz
Site map
Guest Book

 

 

 

Children's Mental Health Site of the Month

 

 

 

 

Several Bills Impacting People With Disabilities/Seniors Introduced

CA DISABILITY COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK
CAPITOL NEWS REPORT #207-2004
December 14, 2004 -  Tuesday
Linking people to disability rights and unified action
NEW Website location:  www.cdcan.us    Toll-free info Lines Up

CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE
* Several Bills Impacting People with Disabilities/Seniors Introduced
* Daucher Introduces Olmstead Related Bill On Inappropriate Placements
* Leslie Introduces Public Accommodations Access Bill
* Bill Calling For Minimum Wage Increase Introduced
* No Action On Any Bill Until Mid-January At Earliest

SACRAMENTO  -  The California Legislature, after swearing in new members last week, also introduced a total of 96 bills, including a bill about inappropriate placement of people with disabilities and seniors in health facilities, legislation calling for increase in the State minimum wage and legislation that may make changes related to access to public accommodations by people with disabilities.  All three bills are likely to generate intense interest among people with disabilities and seniors.
The Legislature also introduced 30 proposed constitutional amendments and resolutions

The Legislature met for only one day (December 7), before adjourning until January 3, 2005.  No action will be taken on any of the bills introduced last week until at least mid-January or later.  Many of the bills introduced so far include only intent language and no actual provisions and will have major changes made sometime next year before they are heard in committee. Some bills will never get beyond the first stage of being simply introduced - and others could become part of the 2005-2006 budget process.  The 126 measures introduced so far represent just a fraction that the Legislature will consider next year - with the bulk of the over 2,900 bills introduced In January and February (not counting resolutions and constitutional amendments).

Some other bills or constitutional amendments to watch include:
* A proposed constitutional amendment for a two-year budget cycle by Assemblymember Ronald Calderon (D-Montebello, 58th District) ; and a proposed constitutional amendment making major changes to the budget process that has almost no chance of passage in its current form by Sen. Tom McClintock (R-Thousand Oaks, 19th District).  Note: these proposed constitutitional amendments - which require 2/3rds vote of both houses to be placed on the next general or special election ballot, are separate from those initiatives placed on the ballot through signatures of voters.
* A bill to consolidate various state agencies (but does not include in its current form,  any agency or department impacting people with disabilities or seniors, AB 53) was introduced by Assemblymember Gloria Negrete McCleod (D-Chino, 61st District).

NEXT STEPS
* Legislature reconvenes January 3, 2005 - Monday
* Committee chairs have been appointed in both houses (see previous CDCAN Capitol News Reports) but no committee members have yet been appointed in either house yet.
* Legislative policy committees could hold hearings on bills introduced in December, as early as the first week of January - but more likely will not do so until late in the month (in part because members have not yet been appointed) or in February at the earliest.  Budget committee hearings begin in early March - though informational budget hearings could be held earlier depending on what the Governor proposes.
* Gov. Schwarzenegger will deliver his 2nd "State of the State" address to a joint session of the California Legislature on January 5, 2005, at 5:00 PM and present his proposed budget for 2005-2006 on or before January 10 (Monday), as required by the State Constitution.

SUMMARY OF BILLS INTRODUCED
Below are bills impacting people with disabilities and seniors introduced to date, by the California Legislature.  The bills are sorted by subject area, and within those areas, by bill number (Assembly first). Note that the content of the bills will change as the legislation moves forward next year. No action will be taken on any of these bills until next year - mid-January at the very earliest.

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT & OLMSTEAD DECISION BILLS
AB 10 - INAPPROPRIATE PLACEMENT OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES & SENIORS
AUTHOR: Assemblymember Lynn Daucher (R-Brea, 72nd District)
WHAT THIS BILL PROPOSES TO DO: Would require all private and public health facilities licensed as general acute care hospitals or skilled nursing facilities to take steps to comply with the 1999 US Supreme Court Olmstead Decision (527 U.S. 581) that requires the states to take measures to prevent the "unnecessary institutionalization" of persons with disabilities and seniors.  Would require the Secretary of California Health and Human Agency to develop and adopt a statewide uniform patient assessment and would require the health facilities to adopt procedures that are in compliance with the uniform patient assessment.
STATUS: Introduced December 6. May be heard in committee on or after January 6, 2005.
NEXT STEPS:  Bill needs to be assigned to a policy committee - likely Assembly Human Services Committee.
HOW THIS IMPACTS PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES/SENIORS:  This bills addresses the issue of uniform assessments of the placement of people with disabilities and seniors in health facilities to comply with the 1999 US Supreme Court Olmstead Decision.  This bill does not include assessments for people with developmental disabilities in health facilities, which the author says is adequately addressed in current law.
CDCAN COMMENT: Daucher was the chair of the temporary  Assembly Select Committee on Olmstead Implementation, which went out of existence as of November 30.  Advocates are urging Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez (D-Los Angeles) to continue the committee, which is charged with reviewing California's implementation of the 1999 US Supreme Court decision, but does not hear bills.  Daucher's bill, which will likely go through many changes even before its first hearing, is meant to continue the efforts last year by Sen. Wes Chesbro (D-Arcata, 2nd District) who authored SB 1365 that called for the establishment of a state Olmstead Advisory Council to review the State's compliance with the US Supreme Court decision.  Gov. Schwarzenegger vetoed the bill in September.  Daucher also was the author of several special education bills in the 2003-2004 session, at least two which were controversial, dividing special education advocates.

AB 20 - PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES - PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS
AUTHOR: Assemblymember Tim Leslie (R-Tahoe City, 4th District)
WHAT THIS BILL PROPOSES TO DO: In its current introduced form, the bill would only make "non-substantive, technical changes" to state law relating to access to public accommodations by persons with disabilities.
STATUS: Introduced December 6. May be heard in committee on or after January 6, 2005.
NEXT STEPS: Bill needs to be assigned to a policy committee, likely Assembly Judiciary Committee. Could also be referred to a second policy committee, possibly Assembly Human Services Committee.
HOW THIS IMPACTS PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES/SENIORS:  The current form of the bill has no major impact, but it is likely that major changes to current state law relating to access to public facilities by persons with disabilities, will be amended into this bill later next year.
CDCAN COMMENT: This bill will likely be amended early next year to make substantive changes to current state law impacting access to public accommodations by people with disabilities.  Leslie has introduced two previous bills in the last two years (AB 209, which failed passage in Assembly Judiciary in 2003, and AB 2594, which died in Assembly Judiciary Committee in the spring of 2004) along with former Sen. Rico Oller (SB 69, which failed passage in Senate Judiciary in 2003).  Some advocates believe those bills were efforts to reverse rights gained by people with disabilities by restricting lawsuits to enforce state laws regarding discrimination of persons with disabilities in public facilities, businesses, and housing accommodations.  Some small business advocates however say that some lawsuits filed against small businesses have not responsible and have caused great financial harm - a charge that some disability advocates dispute.  The issue is likely to come to a head again, with this new bill next year, with possible support at some point by the Governor.

COMMUNITY-BASED ORGANIZATIONS & DIRECT CARE WORKERS BILLS
AB 48 - MINIMUM WAGE
AUTHOR: Assemblymember Sally Lieber (D-Santa Clara, 22nd District)
WHAT THIS BILL PROPOSES TO DO:
This bill, in its current form, simply states the intent of the Legislature to increase the State minimum wage effective on and after January 1, 2005.
STATUS: Introduced December 6, 2004. May be heard in committee on or after January 6, 2005.
NEXT STEPS: Bill needs to be assigned to a policy committee, likely Assembly Labor and Employment Committee.
HOW THIS IMPACTS PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES/SENIORS:  In its current form with only intent language, the bill has no impact.  However when actual language is amended into the bill next year, the increase in the state minimum wage will have direct and major impact to direct care workers providing support to children and adults with developmental and other disabilities and seniors, and also direct and major impact to community-based organizations who employ direct care workers.  Some advocates say that  the bill will need to exempt these community-based organizations - who rely on State reimbursements to fund programs that the State depends on, or require the State to increase reimbursements to cover any wage increases. These advocates claim that without those provisions, any increase will mean another large cut to services and programs, on top of previous State budget cuts and rate freezes - and in addition to what many fear are more cuts in the 2005-2006 budget.
CDCAN COMMENT: Lieber introduced a bill, AB 2832, last session that called for raising the state minimum wage from the current $6.75 per hour to $7.25 as of July 1, 2005 and increasing it to $7.75 as of July 1, 2006.  The bill passed in August 2004 by a strictly party line vote of 22-14 in the Senate and 46-33 in the Assembly and was vetoed by Gov. Schwarzenegger on September 18, 2004.  Though not directly related - but linked, is a class action federal lawsuit, pending in the US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals (Sanchez v. Johnson) that made the claim that disparity in wages funded by the State for direct care workers in community based services for people with developmental disabilities as opposed to wages paid by the State to State workers in State run institutions (Developmental Centers) is a major cause for unnecessary institutionalization.  The US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals heard the case last week and a ruling is expected soon.  If the Court rules in favor, and the State does not appeal to the US Supreme Court or settle, the case would be returned to the US Federal District Court in Oakland for further action and possible trial.

HEALTH AND MEDI-CAL BILLS
AB 28 - MEDI-CAL - PROVIDER LIABILITY PROTECTION
AUTHOR: Assemblymember Alan Nakanishi (R-Lodi, 10th District)
WHAT THIS BILL PROPOSES TO DO:
In its current form, this bill would express the Legislature's intent to ensure that Medi-Cal health care providers who contract to provide medical services to underserved populations as agents of the state are provided liability protection by the state. The bill includes the intent of the Legislature that access to medical care for indigent residents be improved by providing liability
protection to health care providers who offer free quality medical services to underserved people in the State by providing them with immunity.
STATUS: Introduced on December 6, 2004. Can be heard in committee on or after January 6, 2005.
NEXT STEPS: Needs to be assigned to policy committee, likely Assembly Health Committee.
HOW THIS IMPACTS PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES/SENIORS: Some advocates - and Nakanishi agrees, that a significant
number of Californians who are either Medi-Cal recipients or have no health care insurance are unable to access needed health care because  providers fear the increased risk of medical malpractice liability.

ACR 1 - STEM CELL RESEARCH OVERSIGHT CONFLICT OF INTEREST STANDARDS
AUTHOR: Assemblymember Gloria Negrete McCleod (D-Chino, 61st District)
WHAT THIS RESOLUTION CALLS FOR: Would urge the Independent Citizen's Oversight Committee established pursuant to Proposition 71 approved by the voters at the November 2, 2004, general election, to adopt strong conflict-of-interest standards for itself and for the members of its working groups, to comply with provisions of current State law relating to open meetings of public agencies and public records, and to report to the Legislature by April 1, 2005.
STATUS:  Introduced December 6, 2004. May be heard in committee on or after January 6, 2005.
NEXT STEPS: Needs to be assigned to policy committee, likely Assembly Health Committee.
HOW THIS IMPACTS PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES & SENIORS:  No major or direct impact, in part because even if this passes, it is only a resolution by the Legislature. However the issue of the work of the Independent Citizens Oversight Committee is critical - and some advocates believe strongly that its work must be open and comply with State open meet and public record laws.
CDCAN COMMENT: California voters passed overwhelmingly, Proposition 71 on November 2 by the final vote of  7,018,059
(59.1%) for, and 4,867,090 (40.9%) against. Though President George W. Bush and officially the California Republican Party opposed the measure, Gov. Schwarzenegger supported the ballot initiative.  Proposition 71 was supported by Democrats in both houses of the Legislature - and originally pushed by Sen. Deborah Ortiz (D-Sacramento, 6th District) .

SB 23 - MEDI-CAL AND HEALTHY FAMILIES
AUTHOR: Sen. Carole Migden (D-San Francisco,
WHAT THIS BILL PROPOSES TO DO: Would require the Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board to develop an informational document about the Healthy Families Program and Medi-Cal. Would require the Employment  Development Department to notify employers who would be required to provide the notice to their employees. Would also require the Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board to establish a process that would allow an employer to elect to allow employees to have the family contribution payments for health care coverage under the Healthy Families Program deducted from the employee's pay and transmitted to the board by the employer, or to have the contribution payments transferred from a designated financial institution to the Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board. Would require the Department of Health Services to work with the Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board to implement outreach and marketing to encourage participation of both the Healthy Families and Medi-Cal programs and to annually evaluate the effectiveness of the outreach and marketing through December 31, 2007, and to report to the Legislature.
STATUS: Introduced December 6, 2004. May be heard in committee on or after January 6, 2005.
NEXT STEPS: Needs to be assigned to policy committee - likely Assembly Health Committee.
HOW THIS BILL IMPACTS PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES & SENIORS:  As introduced, the bill would have some impact for children and adults with disabilities or seniors who might be eligible, but for various reasons were not previously enrolled in Medi-Cal, or possibly increase enrollment for children under 19 years in the Healthy Families program. Some of those children (and their parents) could be people with disabilities or mental health needs who might not be eligible for Medi-Cal for various reasons.

HOUSING BILLS
AB 63 - HOME IMPROVEMENT LOAN FOR SENIORS & PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES
AUTHOR: Assemblymember Audra Strickland (R-Thousand Oaks, 37th District)
WHAT THIS BILL PROPOSES TO DO: In its current introduced form,  would establish within the Department of Housing and Community Development the "Elderly and Disabled Persons' Revolving Home Improvement Loan Program. The program would provide grants to local public agencies or nonprofit corporations, or to provide no-interest home improvement loans (maximum $5,000) to qualified low- and moderate-income seniors and persons with disabilities to assist them with daily activities and prevent injury and to allow them to remain safely in their own homes.
STATUS:  Introduced December 9, 2004.  May be heard in committee on or after January 10, 2005.
NEXT STEPS: Needs to be assigned to policy committee, likely Assembly Housing and Community Development Committee.
HOW THIS IMPACTS PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES & SENIORS:  The bill, similar to Sen. Margett's SB 120 of 2003-2004, will help seniors and people with disabilities with financial assistance to make home improvements to help assist in their daily living activities and to help with safety or to prevent injury (including possibly bathroom handrails,  wheelchair ramps). The Department of Aging and the California Association of Area Agencies on Aging would be consulted by the Department Housing and Community Development in the development of this program.
CDCAN COMMENT: Current State law already authorizes the Department of Housing and Community Development to make grants to nonprofit housing sponsors and local public entities for operating, administrative, and other expenses of planning, constructing, rehabilitating, and operating assisted housing and to make grants to housing sponsors for the benefit of residents of assisted housing and establishes the Senior Housing Information and Support Center within the Department of Aging to provide  information and training, including housing options and home modification alternatives designed to support independent living.
 

FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT CA DISABILITY COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK
URGENT - CONTRIBUTIONS NEEDED TO CONTINUE EFFORT
Many many, thanks again,  to the friends, people with disabilities and their families, community organizations and others who have sent in generous and needed contributions and donations.  Contributions from people and organizations is  very urgently needed to keep the advocacy efforts going for the next several months, as we work to establish non-profit status which we are working on.. Apologies to anyone who have not yet received a thank you - email, letters, calls have been overwhelming!  Your help is needed though to keep the effort going!
Please make check or money order  to:  California Disability Community Action Network  (or abbreviate CDCAN).  A method to contribute by credit card (through Paypal) is NOW set up on our website, at www.cdcan.us  [new site address]  Send contributions to: California Disability Community Action Network,  1225 8th Street Suite #480, Sacramento, CA  95814.
* Who Is CDCAN?
The California Disability Community Action Network is a non-partisan link to thousands of Californians with developmental and other disabilities, people with traumatic brain and other injures, seniors and their families, community organizations and providers, direct care and other workers, and other advocates.
These action alerts and news reports is for all of them. In addition it also goes to news organizations, state and local government officials and staff.
* How To Receive CDCAN Capitol News Reports and Alerts
If you would like to get on this distribution (and conversely, get off of it) please send an email with that  request to:  martyomoto@rcip.com  OR sign up via the
NEW CDCAN website at www.cdcan.us   Sharing information is part of our organizing effort. Please feel free to forward or copy  this (attribution is nice). We're all in this together!
* How To Contact CDCAN
Marty Omoto, director/organizer  WEBSITE:  www.cdcan.us  [new address]
1225 8th Street Suite 480 Sacramento, CA 95814   VOICE PHONE: 916/446-0013
FAX number: 916/446-0026        email: martyomoto@rcip.com 
 

Last Updated on 12/15/04   webmaster@namiscc.org

 

Home Phone Nos. Links Search Advocacy Editorial Experiences News Newsletters People Recovery Research Santa Cruz Site map Guest Book

Opinions expressed in this web site do not necessarily reflect the views of NAMI Santa Cruz County, NAMI California or any affiliated organizations.  We attempt to present a balanced perspective on issues by presenting multiple viewpoints.

Copyright 2004, 2005 National Alliance for the Mentally Ill Santa Cruz County, All Rights Reserved.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted (©) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml  If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.