NAMI SCC Website

 

 

 

 

 

Home
Phone Nos.
Links
Search
Advocacy
Editorial
Experiences
News
Newsletters
People
Recovery
Research
Santa Cruz
Site map
Guest Book

 

 

 

Children's Mental Health Site of the Month

 

 

 

 

AB 1629 & AB 2100 PASS OUT OF SENATE

 HEALTH / HUMAN SERVICES

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

CA DISABILITY COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK
CAPITOL NEWS REPORT - ISSUE #145-2004  AUGUST 19, 2004 - THURSDAY
Linking people to disability rights and unified action
Note: Virus Alert - Beware of Attachments! There is NEVER any attachment to CDCAN Reports.
Website WILL be up by the weekend. New location:  www.cdcan.us    Toll-free info Lines Up

Senate Health & Human Services Committee Hearing Today
TWO MAJOR CONTROVERISAL BILLS IMPACTING PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES AND SENIORS PASS OUT OF HASTILY CALLED SENATE POLICY COMMITTEE -  HEAD FOR SENATE FLOOR

SACRAMENTO   -  Two bills dealing with different approaches toward California's institutionalized care of people with disabilities and seniors passed out of a hastily called Senate Health and Human Services Committee this afternoon (8/19) and now head to the Senate Floor for a final vote there sometime early next week. Both bills had  last minute major amendments made earlier this week that infuriated opponents of the bills, with additional changes made just prior to the hearing, that failed to satisfy the opposition.  Both bills passed out of committee, with amendments.  A full report of the hearing will be issued later today, along with descriptions and analysis of the bills and the latest new amendments, and positions of proponents and opponents.  A report on the California Long Term Care Council meeting, chaired by California Health and Human Services Secretary Kim Belshe,  also held today, will also be included.

AB 1629 by Assemblymember Dario Frommer (D-Los Angeles) and co-authored by Assemblyman Keith Richman (R-Northridge), was amended earlier this week, with new additional amendments presented in committee,  and calls for imposing a quality assurance fee on long term care facilities, including nursing homes.  Frommer and Richman said the legislation - which is an emergency or "urgency" bill that would take effect mmediately upon approval of the Governor, is needed to address the crisis in nursing home care and could draw down  over $250 million dollars in new federal funds.
The controversial measure was pushed forward by an unusual alliance of health facilities and nursing home providers, the nursing home worker union and some senior advocacy organizations.  It was strongly opposed by other disability rights and senior organizations, including AARP, who claimed the legislation did not contain enough protections and quality assurance for people with disabilities and seniors who are in nursing homes and fails to address California's compliance with the 1999 US Supreme Court Olmstead Decision. Opponents also said that they were not included in stakeholder meetings and given very little notice regarding the proposal itself and that a delay in passage of the bill until next January would protect the rights of seniors and people with disabilities in those health facilities, without damaging the potential new federal funding.  A union advocate countered that if the Legislature did not pass AB 1629, which is an "urgency" or emergency bill, a  "regular bill" introduced next January would mean a long delay in implementing the quality assurance fee and rate reimbursement plan. Another advocate, opposing the bill, however responded later that proponents could introduce next January another "urgency" bill, without causing harm.  A full report on this bill and the hearing will be reported in a CDCAN Capitol News Report later tonight.
WHAT'S NEXT:
* SENATE FLOOR - The bill now heads to the Senate Floor early next week (it may have a brief hearing by the Senate Appropriations Committee just before that).  The bill requires 2/3rds vote (27 votes) of the 40 member Senate before heading to the Assembly, meaning it will need at least 2 Republican votes, assuming all 25 Democrats support the bill.
* ASSEMBLY - The Assembly Health Committee may hear this bill next week, assuming the Senate approves the bill. The hearing will likely be a quick hearing, with very little notice.  Because the bill is an "urgency" measure, it will require 2/3rds vote of the 80 member Assembly (54 votes) meaning it will need at least 6 Republican votes, assuming all 48 Democrats support it.  The bill must be passed out of both houses on or before August 31 - the date the Legislature adjourns for the year or it is dead.

AB 2100 by Assemblymember Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento) also was amended earlier this week and calls for developing a affordable housing plan for some of the residents of Agnews Developmental Center near San Jose, which is slated for closure by July 2006.  The plan also applies to  those people with developmental disabilities at risk of being placed at the Agnews Developmental Center.  The plan itself does not call for closure of the 118 year old state facility, which is being advanced in a separate proposal as part of the Governor's proposed budget for 2005-2006, in January.  If the housing plan is successful, Schwarzenegger Administration officials believe it could be a model for other areas of the State serving people with developmental and other disabilities.  The plan was backed by the Schwarzenegger Administration, and also by the non-profit regional centers who provide services to children and adults with developmental disabilities in the Bay Area where Agnews Developmental Center is located, and by several disability advocacy groups.  Those advocates called the plan a major step in moving California toward compliance with the 1999 US Supreme Court Olmstead Decision, and that the plan would bring stability, health and safety for many of the Agnews Developmental Center residents, which could be a model for the rest of the State.
The plan was strongly opposed by an association representing  families of people who reside at Agnews, by another group, called "Keep Our Families Together", also representing many of those families who don't oppose closure but prefer other community-based options, and by a statewide association of developmental center families, and also a statewide association representing several community-based organizations who provide services to people with developmental disabilities.  Those advocates differed on the issue of whether Agnews Developmental Center should be closed - a decision the State has not yet finalized - but were united in their criticism that none of them were invited to a critical stakeholder meeting where the proposal was introduced.  The opponents also had different reasons for opposing the plan, including insurance, licensing issues and the possible creation of a "two tiered system" that serves people with developmental disabilities, and several health and safety issues.   A full report on this bill and the hearing will be reported in a CDCAN Capitol News Report later tonight.
WHAT'S NEXT:
* AUGUST 20th STAKEHOLDER MEETING - The Department of Developmental Services has scheduled a stakeholder meeting to hear concerns of those opposing the AB 2100, and also including those who support it on AUGUST 20, FRIDAY afternoon from 1 PM to 4 PM, at the Department of Developmental Services office, Room 360 (conference room), at 1600 9th Street in Sacramento.  Space is very limited.  Limited conference phone lines will be available, though may be also limited.  Sen. Deborah Ortiz (D-Sacramento), who chairs the Senate Health and Human Services Committee, along with Senators Vasconcellos (D-Santa Clara) and Figueroa (D-Fremont), at today's hearing strongly admonished  the Department of Developmental Services for not making sure that family member groups  and other opponents were invited to previous stakeholder meetings where the proposal was discussed.  The Department of Developmental Services previously had said those groups were welcome, and it was not intentional that all of them were not invited.
* SENATE FLOOR - The bill now heads to the Senate Floor early next week (it may have a brief hearing by the Senate Appropriations Committee just before that).  The bill requires a simple major vote (21 votes)  of the 40 member Senate before heading to the Assembly.  The bill must be passed out of both houses on or before August 31 - the date the Legislature adjourns for the year.
* ASSEMBLY - the Assembly Human Services Committee is expected to hear the bill in a quick hearing sometime later next week, before a final vote before the full Assembly.
 

FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT CA DISABILITY COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK
URGENT - CONTRIBUTIONS NEEDED TO CONTINUE EFFORT
Please help continue the effort! Many many, thanks again,  to the friends, people with disabilities and their families, community organizations and others who have sent in generous and needed contributions and donations.  Contributions from people and organizations is  very urgently needed to keep the advocacy efforts going for the next several months, as we work to establish non-profit status, which we can focus after the budget is signed.  Apologies to anyone who have not yet received a thank you - emails, letters, calls have been overwhelming!
Please make check or money order  to:  California Disability Community Action Network  (or abbreviate CDCAN).  A method to contribute by credit card (through Paypal) is NOW set up on our website, at www.cdcan.org.   CDCAN is not yet a non-profit organization but will be soon.  Send contributions to: California Disability Community Action Network,  1225 8th Street Suite #480, Sacramento, CA  95814.  A method to contribute by credit card (through Paypal) is NOW set up on our website, at www.cdcan.org.
* Who Is CDCAN?
The California Disability Community Action Network is a non-partisan link to thousands of Californians with developmental and other disabilities, their families, community organizations and providers, direct care and other workers, and other advocates. These action alerts and news reports is for all of them. In addition it also goes to news organizations, state and local government officials and staff.
* How To Receive CDCAN Capitol News Reports and Alerts
If you would like to get on this distribution (and conversely, get off of it) please send an email with that  request to:  martyomoto@rcip.com OR sign up via the NEW CDCAN website at www.cdcan.us [note the new site will not be up until possibly this coming weekend, August 21 or August 22)   Sharing information is part of our organizing effort. Please feel free to forward or copy  this (attribution is nice). We're all in this together!
* How To Contact CDCAN
Marty Omoto, director/organizer  -  California Disability Community Action Network   WEBSITE:  currently down - working to bring up again
1225 8th Street Suite 480 Sacramento, CA 95814   VOICE PHONE: 916/446-0013
FAX number: 916/446-0026        email: martyomoto@rcip.com
INFO HOTLINE TOLL FREE NUMBER: 1-877-260-0267 (cannot leave messages) SAME INFO HOTLINE FOR SACRAMENTO AREA:  486-4652

 

Last Updated on 08/27/04   webmaster@namiscc.org

 

Home Phone Nos. Links Search Advocacy Editorial Experiences News Newsletters People Recovery Research Santa Cruz Site map Guest Book

Opinions expressed in this web site do not necessarily reflect the views of NAMI Santa Cruz County, NAMI California or any affiliated organizations.  We attempt to present a balanced perspective on issues by presenting multiple viewpoints.

Copyright 2004, 2005 National Alliance for the Mentally Ill Santa Cruz County, All Rights Reserved.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted (©) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml  If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.