Association Health Plan Bill in Senate Would Weaken Parity

NAMI SCC Website

_______________________________________________
NAMI E-News May 11, 2004 Vol. 4-25
_______________________________________________

Association Health Plan Bill in Senate Would Weaken Parity

In June, 2003, the U.S. House of Representatives passed Small Business Health Plan (AHP) legislation. On May 12, 2004, the Senate is scheduled to vote on a similar bill - S. 545 – the Small Business Health Fairness Act of 2003. Advocates are urged to contact your U.S. Senators to request their opposition to this bill. If S. 545 passes, state mental illness parity laws will be significantly weakened.

Multi-employer Association Health Plans (AHPs) undermine existing state laws that require health plans to cover treatment for mental illness on the same terms and conditions as all other illnesses - commonly referred to as parity. HR 660 and S. 545 significantly expand the scope of a federal law (known as ERISA), that exempts self- insured employer health plans from state regulation. By expanding ERISA, HR 660 and S. 545 encourage employers that currently offer health plans for their workers (and their families) to switch away from coverage that meets a parity standard, i.e. plans that cover mental illnesses the same as all other illnesses.

The AHPs envisioned by HR 660 and S. 545 are exempt from all state insurance laws, including: state parity laws, minimum coverage standards for mental illness treatment and other consumer protections. The supporters of AHPs asserted that HR 660 and S. 545 would help make employer coverage more affordable and ease the growth among the uninsured. However, several recent studies have found that AHPs are not effective in reaching uninsured workers and their families and are more likely to fail as a result of insolvency.

Action Requested

Advocates are strongly encouraged to contact their Senate member to urge them to oppose S. 545. Remind your Senators that this well-intentioned legislation would have enormous negative consequences for workers and their families. In NAMI's view, S. 545 would:

- severely undermine the effectiveness of the 34 state mental illness insurance parity laws,
- fail to address the problem of the uninsured - studies demonstrate that most employers that would switch to AHP coverage already provide coverage on their own, and
- place workers and their families at risk of losing coverage - studies show that AHPs have a long history of plan failures and insolvency (AHPs would not have to meet current solvency and reserve standards enforced by state insurance commissioners).

Click on the link below for a letter that you can send to your Senator.

www.nami.org/enews4-25

__________________

Please do not reply to this message. This is a post-only e-mail.

If you do not wish to receive future editions of NAMI e-News, please send your request to elise@nami.org

Last Updated on 05/12/04 webmaster@namiscc.org

Opinions expressed in this web site do not necessarily reflect the views of NAMI Santa Cruz County, NAMI California or any affiliated organizations. We attempt to present a balanced perspective on issues by presenting multiple viewpoints.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted (©) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.