NAMI SCC Website

 

 

 

 

 

Home
Phone Nos.
Links
Search
Advocacy
Editorial
Experiences
News
Newsletters
People
Recovery
Research
Santa Cruz
Site map
Guest Book

 

 

 

Children's Mental Health Site of the Month

 

 

 

 

Don’t Silence Nonprofits

NYAPRS Note: The following comes to us courtesy of our friends at Housing Works, who led an e-mail drive, that was supported by NYAPRS members, against possible federal restrictions on advocacy by nonprofit groups.

Federal Election Commission Will Not Be Imposing New Restrictions On Nonprofit Groups

Housing Works Aids Issues Update May 14, 2004

In Washington today, four of the six commissioners of the Federal Election Commission (FEC) voted against immediate imposition of new rules and restrictions for nonprofit advocacy. The FEC will delay any action on proposed new regulations for at least three months, and most observers agreed that action isn't likely before the November elections.

Last month, Housing Works testified against proposed regulations that would have severely restricted advocacy by nonprofit groups. Originally, the FEC considered forcing nonprofits that "promote, attack, support or oppose" members of Congress, the President or Vice-President, or candidates for those offices to severely limit their fundraising activities and submit to federal election law registration and activity limits.

This week, two FEC commissioners proposed applying the new limits only to Section 527 political committees (including the Media Fund, Americans Coming Together, and the MoveOn.org Voter Fund.) But the remaining four commissioners opted for no action at all.

We're glad the FEC took our advice and held off from whacking nonprofit groups. And we salute our pals at the Alliance for Justice and the other 150,000 folks who submitted testimony. Ours is at
http://www.fec.gov/pdf/nprm/political_comm_status/housing_works_kink.pdf

Source: Housing Works

This 'Mental Health E-News' posting is a service of the New York Ass'n of Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services, a statewide coalition of people who use and/or provide community mental health services dedicated to improving services and social conditions for people with psychiatric disabilities by promoting their recovery, rehabilitation and rights. To join our list, please click on the E-News Subscription button.

 

Schenectady Daily Gazette Editorial April 18, 2004

Just in time for this year’s political campaigns, the Federal Election Commission is reportedly contemplating a change to campaign finance law that would have the effect of muzzling politically active nonprofit groups. That may well not be the intention, but it’s misguided either way.

The change would bar any nonprofit group that spends more than $50,000 to support or attack any candidate for federal office in any year from receiving contributions from foundations, corporations or unions. Most likely, doing so would put them out of business, so the change would have the effect of silencing them — which in some cases could prevent them from doing their job.

Whether it’s New York environmentalists criticizing the president’s energy policies or Right-to-Life advocates praising his stand on late-term abortions, groups would be limited in how much they spend to spread their message. The $50,000 ceiling might seem like a lot, but if it took into account a group leader’s time and/or expenses — the rules aren’t final yet — the limit could be reached rather quickly.

Many of these groups exist to advocate for constituencies like the poor or the mentally ill, etc. — which is entirely their right. If a congressman, senator or the president is perceived as a hindrance to their cause, they might deserve to be criticized.

By the same token, if some foundation, corporation or union doesn’t like the political stand, or the amount of politicking the group is engaged in, it’s their right to withhold contributions.

The idea of standards and limits for this type of thing is also problematic because of who might do the judging as to what constitutes opinion and what’s merely a statement of fact. The government should just keep out.

Source:
http://www.dailygazette.net/standard/ShowStoryTemplate.asp?Path=SCH/2004/04/18&ID=Ar04802&Section=Opinion

This 'Mental Health E-News' posting is a service of the New York Ass'n of Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services, a statewide coalition of people who use and/or provide community mental health services dedicated to improving services and social conditions for people with psychiatric disabilities by promoting their recovery, rehabilitation and rights.

To join our list, e-mail us your request and, where appropriate, the name of your organization to NYAPRSadm@aol.com.

_______________________________________________

                  

 

Last Updated on 05/20/04   webmaster@namiscc.org

 

Home Phone Nos. Links Search Advocacy Editorial Experiences News Newsletters People Recovery Research Santa Cruz Site map Guest Book

Opinions expressed in this web site do not necessarily reflect the views of NAMI Santa Cruz County, NAMI California or any affiliated organizations.  We attempt to present a balanced perspective on issues by presenting multiple viewpoints.

Copyright 2004, 2005 National Alliance for the Mentally Ill Santa Cruz County, All Rights Reserved.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted (©) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml  If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.