NAMI SCC Website

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home
About
Links
Search
Advocacy
Editorial
Experiences
News
Newsletters
People
Recovery
Research
Santa Cruz
Site Map
Guest Book

 

 

Children's Mental Health Site of the Month

 

 

Imprisoned by Medicare

Senator Dole: Working to Amend Medicare's homebound requirement

Below please find an excellent Op-Ed article by Bob Dole that appeared in yesterday's Washington Post. Dole writes eloquently in support of what has become known as the David Jayne Amendment, which would amend the Medicare Homebound Restriction to enable people with severe disabilities to participate in community life without losing access to Medicare home health services. Advancing Independence: Modernizing Medicare and Medicaid (AIMMM), the Visiting Nurses Association of America (VNAA), and AAPD are working with the National Coalition to Amend the Medicare Homebound Restriction (NCAHB), founded by David Jayne, to change the outdated rule.

The David Jayne Amendment would provide an exception under the homebound rule to individuals who have permanent and severe disabilities, are unable to leave the home without personal or technological assistance, and who are eligible for the Medicare home health benefit. Contact your Senators and Representatives and ask them to support H.R. 1490 / S. 2085.

Jonathan Young
JFA Editor, AAPD


 

horizontal rule


Imprisoned by Medicare

By Bob Dole

The Washington Post, June 27, 2002

Heroes inspire us to achieve the unachievable, to leave America a better place for future generations. They remind us that contributing to family and community is our highest priority. I am fortunate to know such a hero, and his story has inspired me to help achieve his one simple wish before he dies -- to change a Medicare restriction so that he and thousands of others who live with permanent and severe disabilities can leave their homes to see their children grow up and contribute to their community without losing life-sustaining home health services.

David Jayne was diagnosed with Lou Gehrig's disease at age 27. Otherwise known as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), this degenerative neuromuscular condition causes his muscles to atrophy, leaving him unable to eat, breathe or move on his own. Though his mobility is limited to moving three fingers, Jayne, now 41, has demonstrated to everyone who knows him or has read about him that the human spirit is indomitable.

I met David Jayne by chance at Reagan National Airport about a year ago. Attached to life support equipment and a computerized voice simulator because of his body's deterioration at the hand of ALS, Jayne had traveled with the help of friends from his home in Rex, Ga., to meet with his elected members of Congress. He came to urge them to amend the Medicare homebound restriction.

The homebound rule was intended to deter abuse of the home health benefit by limiting services to only those individuals whose illnesses and disabilities are so severe that leaving the home would require "a considerable and taxing effort." In the 1960s, when this rule was created, it reflected the limits of health care and technology at the time. It was incomprehensible then to think that someone with ALS or any severe and permanent disability could leave the home.

While the homebound restriction has not changed, the role of physicians and home health providers has. Nurses, doctors and home health administrators have been turned into watchdogs and given the responsibility to report any knowledge of their patients leaving their homes. And the awful reality of those receiving these services is that they must either lie or cheat just to enjoy fundamental liberties.

This nearly 40-year-old policy reflects an outmoded view of life for persons with disabilities. Thanks to advances in technology and greater community accessibility through the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), people with the most severe disabilities are able to leave their homes to go to work, volunteer in their communities and enjoy their family and friends. Unfortunately, Medicare policy has not kept pace with our times and is now punishing the very people it was intended to benefit. While Medicare has developed other and better policies to deter abuse, it has kept this outdated policy.

The Medicare statute does allow for absences from the home of "infrequent" or "relatively short duration." But the vagueness of this allowance leaves it to Medicare contractors to interpret just how many absences qualify as "frequent" and just how short those absences might be. To err on the conservative side, contractors have stripped home health coverage from those most needing it, including David Jayne, whose life depends on a ventilator, intravenous feeding and daily care from a home health aide. Because Jayne's story went public, his home health agency discontinued these life-sustaining services. They were only reinstated after members of Congress became involved and Jayne agreed to pay his home health provider for any claim denied by Medicare. But thousands of others live in fear of leaving their homes because of the stories that have been reported. In two heartbreaking cases, one mother's services were cut off after she attended the funeral for her child, while another mother did not attend the funeral of her child because of fear of losing her home health care.

For millions of Americans, Medicare-covered home health services provide a less costly alternative to nursing home or hospital care. There are abuses that should be corrected, but not by extracting a price that no law-abiding American should ever have to pay.

David Jayne has inspired many people with his love and determination and his simple words, "Always wait another day because the next day will be better." He inspired me to volunteer to try to help.

I urge the House of Representatives to amend this harsh restriction on individual freedom by including in the Medicare reform bill the David Jayne Amendment, carefully drafted by Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), to do what we all know in our hearts is right, including all the appropriate safeguards to prevent abuse. And if this is not possible because of cost concerns, to adopt an amendment to provide for those who are severely and permanently disabled and who require the assistance of an attendant or a skilled nursing facility.

The amendment should give the Health and Human Services Department six months to address the homebound rule and make recommendations on how to bring it up to date with today's technology. Make no mistake, David Jayne is a prisoner -- a prisoner in his specially designed wheelchair. His illness has robbed him of the ability to do anything without the aid of technology. Medicare shouldn't act as jailer too. Thousands of David Jaynes across America are looking to the president, Congress and the Department of Health and Human Services for help.

-- Former senator Dole is volunteer honorary chairman of the National Coalition to Amend the Homebound Restriction.

Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A52363-2002Jun26.html

horizontal rule


JUSTICE FOR ALL -- A Service of the American Association of People with Disabilities
www.aapd-dc.org www.jfanow.org
There's strength in numbers! Be a part of a national coalition of people with disabilities and join AAPD today.
 

 

 

Home About Links Search Advocacy Editorial Experiences News Newsletters People Recovery Research Santa Cruz Site Map Guest Book

Opinions expressed in this web site do not necessarily reflect the views of NAMI Santa Cruz County, NAMI California or any affiliated organizations.  We attempt to present a balanced perspective on issues by presenting multiple viewpoints.

Copyright 2004, 2005 National Alliance for the Mentally Ill Santa Cruz County, All Rights Reserved.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted (©) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml  If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.