NAMI SCC Website

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home
About
Links
Search
Advocacy
Editorial
Experiences
News
Newsletters
People
Recovery
Research
Santa Cruz
Site Map
Guest Book

 

 

Children's Mental Health Site of the Month

 

 

Observations on Mental Health Services 

An email chain discussion...

Hi All,

I wanted to share this with you. My son is in a IMD (institute for mental disease) called Creekside. I know some of you have heard of it. They say it is one of the better in Northern California. He has been there 18 months and in that time he had one roommate, Tom. Tom is older, my guess is 40s but one of the most friendly, easy going people I have met there, my guess is that he has schizophrenia, sometimes he seemed quite psychotic and uable to have a conversation.


While my son has been at Creekside I have been paying for a therapist to come in and work with my son (my insurance pays for some of it), she is a speech and communications pathologist who works with autism. She has made all the difference for my son. Anyways, she is not familiar with the mentally ill or the system but these last few months she has been telling me some interesting insights from her therapy viewpoint. This is one email she recently sent me. Tom was very happy to leave Creekside and go to a group home, that had 8 other residents 1 month ago. He is back at Creekside. This therapist and I have been talking about this idea of rehab, which is what Creekside (7th Ave. too) is supposed to be. She is very baffled as to what is the rehab part of it, coming from a therapist point of view. This is what my son's therapist had to say. Remember she works the autistic children and working with my son was a very new thing for her, in a IMD with an adult!


"It was funny I overheard the person who brought Tom back say that "Tom sure loves Creekside" - you know if people go from Creekside - which is very sheltered (for lack of a better word) to almost no support - and a lot of freedom in a group home that seems to me like a very big step - of course people are going to end up right back where they started - I guess that is where the rehab element is missing - other than managing through meds what else is happening? I have a behavior background - I tend to look at the "why" for behaviors - why do these people end up here in the first place - if they only bandaide the problem the bandaide is going to fall off. Just like the buddy pass thing - they think he should go on them but has any one stopped to figure out why he doesn't - and then approach it from that end. I know there aren't answers to why for some of these things but I bet there are enough that could be answered and addressed to make independence more successful for some of these folks."

- D

horizontal rule

Hi D,

I think that the focus on therapy is lost when the programs are designed and staffed by psychiatrists whose training and focus has been that all of this is JUST a biological disorder and can be treated with meds. Of course, there may be a biological element, but these are mental disorders, and it seems that the importance of psychology, therapy, coaching and rehab have been drowned out by the hope that all can be fixed with a pill. Your son's therapist is right, lets hope that more get her insight.

- Doug
 

horizontal rule

There are many interesting issues in what the speech therapist and you all are saying. Where a client wants to live and where he/she feels safe should be directed by the client. I remember one year when our county had a campaign to get long term residents out of Front St. Board and Care. Front St was their home. Sure enough, like Tom in your example, the residents had a big time crisis unnecessarily until they got put back where they wanted to be in the first place.

Some consumers want to live in an independent apartment. I went to a client's Open House party which was a disaster. She had new furniture and had bought lots, too much, food at Costco. But she had not bought sponges for the kitchen, or paper towels for spills on her floor, and did not put any towels out in the bathroom. Now how was she supposed to know to do these things? She had gone in her early days from home to institution. She had never been through that period of having your first apartment and botching it royally and doing it over and over until you get it right. The whole term Re-Habilitate is unfortunately chosen. It's fine for stroke victims or someone injured on the job. Even if we were going to use that model as it is used in general health care, a rehab specialist would ask the patient what he/she needed to be able to do to live independently again. The answers might be get to the bathroom, keep house straight, keep meds straight, get food, operate an answering machine, have emergency numbers to call, have a good radio to block out voices. Real concrete things that could be tackled one by one. Symptom management and swallowing pills is not all there is to life. Dr. Adams hired occupational therapists to help with some of these issues, but the county didn't let them do the work they were trained to do.

I am convinced that in the case of schizophrenia, that speech patterns, recognizing figure from ground in sound patterns, being aware of social linguistic practices is a vital key to functioning better. The rules that most of society take for granted are missing. Such as telling someone when you have finished a task, are leaving the room or the house. How to make small talk. Social rules for interfacing with genders. What is appropriate to say to a neighbor and what is not. And the big one: how to keep mental associations to words in your mind and out of your speech practices so others can understand what you are trying to communicate.

There is some saying: If you only have a hammer, then everything looks like a nail.

Bonnie







 

 

 

Home About Links Search Advocacy Editorial Experiences News Newsletters People Recovery Research Santa Cruz Site Map Guest Book

Opinions expressed in this web site do not necessarily reflect the views of NAMI Santa Cruz County, NAMI California or any affiliated organizations.  We attempt to present a balanced perspective on issues by presenting multiple viewpoints.

Copyright 2004, 2005 National Alliance for the Mentally Ill Santa Cruz County, All Rights Reserved.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted (©) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml  If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.