NAMI SCC Website

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home
About
Links
Search
Advocacy
Editorial
Experiences
News
Newsletters
People
Recovery
Research
Santa Cruz
Site Map
Guest Book

 

 

Children's Mental Health Site of the Month

 

 

 

'Shame, Shame' on NYS Mental Health Policy 

Shame, Shame
Syracuse Post-Standard Editorial November 25, 2002

No one chooses to be mentally ill. Just as no one would choose to get cancer or contract diabetes, no one wants their brain to betray them. People with mental illness are victims just as those with any other chronic illness. They need medical attention.

Mentally ill people who are too sick to care for themselves or those who are so affected that they could be dangerous are rightly the state's responsibility. For generations, people with mental illnesses were confined to locked hospitals. Some languished in wards for decades, having little contact with the outside world. As science learned more about the problems of the mentally ill, and as different forms of therapy developed, experts recommended that many individuals could lead better and happier lives in community-based programs.

New York, like many other states in the 1960s, began shutting down the hospitals. Some of them well deserved to close. They were horrible places - dark and dank. Unspeakable things happened in those old wards. Patients were abused every way possible. Their closure ended a grim era in this state's history.

But the state never fulfilled the other half of the promise. Patients were chucked out of the hospitals, but there simply were not enough places for them to safely land. Instead of community-based homes with lots of supervision and the proper kind of care, thousands of mentally ill people were left to fend for themselves or they were sent to locked nursing home wards - trading one nightmare for a new set of terrors.

Earlier this year, The New York Times uncovered records that proved hundreds of mentally ill people were prisoners in nursing homes, never allowed outside, living in wards and rooms with little or nothing to help them be well.

This month, the Times exposed another outrage. Hundreds more of these patients were sent to nursing homes in New Jersey and Massachusetts - homes that were already in trouble with their own state governments for being substandard. They are places without the expertise or staff to care for people who are mentally ill. Yet, according to state records, just two nursing homes in New Jersey have collected more than $82 million in New York Medicaid payments since 1995.

In Massachusetts, the Sun Bridge nursing homes, known to be substandard in every important way, were paid $260 million to care for mentally ill New Yorkers, according to the Times, which cited Medicaid records. This is how bad some Massachusetts homes are: One patient gouged out the eye of another with his bare hands.

"Massachusetts regulators say the Sun Bridge facilities have deteriorated markedly in recent years, repeatedly criticizing them for mismanagement, shoddy care, sexual assaults and other violence among residents, including the resident's eye gouging last year," said a Times report.

Mental illness, like physical illness, often requires carefully calibrated care. Medications have to be prescribed and delivered with precision. Talk therapy has to be consistent. Neither of those things that can be provided by people qualified only to look after aged people. Are any of the people sent out of state ever seen by doctors? How does that work?

Through all of this, Gov. George Pataki has insisted the decisions to move patients to nursing homes were made on a medical basis. He told the Times during his campaign that more than 5,000 patients were brought back to New York, but no records could be found to substantiate that. John Signor, a spokesman for the state Health Department, told the Times the administration had sent fewer than 50 people annually to facilities outside New York. In fact, Medicaid records show that since 1995, more than 725 New Yorkers have gone to the Lincoln Park and Andover nursing homes (in New Jersey) alone, an average of more than 90 a year.

Why the lies? Perhaps it's because the mentally ill don't have big campaign contributors writing checks on their behalf. Perhaps it's because Pataki knows it's wrong to victimize mentally ill New Yorkers this way.

Here in Syracuse, Hutchings Psychiatric Hospital was targeted by Pataki for closure. It still could be, and God knows where the patients would end up. This administration must be more forthcoming about its plans for caring for the mentally ill.

Source: http://www.syracuse.com/opinion/poststandard/index.ssf?/base/opinion-1/1038130657261900.xml

horizontal rule


This 'Mental Health E-News' posting is a service of the New York Ass'n of Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services, a statewide coalition of people who use and/or provide community mental health services dedicated to improving services and social conditions for people with psychiatric disabilities by promoting their recovery, rehabilitation and rights.

To join our list, e-mail us your request and, where appropriate, the name of your organization to NYAPRS@aol.com.

Last Updated on 04/08/04   webmaster@namiscc.org

 

 

Home About Links Search Advocacy Editorial Experiences News Newsletters People Recovery Research Santa Cruz Site Map Guest Book

Opinions expressed in this web site do not necessarily reflect the views of NAMI Santa Cruz County, NAMI California or any affiliated organizations.  We attempt to present a balanced perspective on issues by presenting multiple viewpoints.

Copyright 2004, 2005 National Alliance for the Mentally Ill Santa Cruz County, All Rights Reserved.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted (©) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml  If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.