President Bush Lets Consumer/Survivor Groups
Down
One of the first accounts of Tuesday's first meeting of the
President's new Mental Health Commission comes from David Oaks, director of the
international psychiatric survivor rights advocacy organization, Support
Coalition International.Sharing concerns raised by a
number of mental health advocates and advocacy groups across the nation, David
decried the proportionate lack of direct consumer/survivor representation on the
Commission (only one, Dr. Daniel Fisher of the National Empowerment Center sits
on the panel), as well as confirmed plans to appoint Sally Satel to the Center
for Mental Health Services' Advisory Board and the Bush Administration's budget
plans which threaten the survival of national consumer technical assistance
organizations funded by CMHS. Satel has publicly denigrated the consumer
organizations and is believed to be a prime instigator behind the
Administration's plans to abandon them.
NYAPRS members and staff have called on the White House on all 3 issues over the
past few months and joined a recent Maryland rally protesting Satel and E.
Fuller Torrey's attacks on the consumer and cultural diversity movements and on
the national consumer organizations.
To see Michael Hogan, chairman of the President's New Freedom Commission on
Mental Health and Ohio Department of Mental Health Director describe the
commission's mission and current plans, view the C-Span interview at
http://www.c-span.org/social_policy and click on that link.
Hogan announced yesterday that the Commission will seek comments in a new
website,
http://www.mentalhealthcommission.gov, that will be up shortly.

President Bush's attack against all disability and mental health groups:
But this time we are not alone!
President's New Freedom Commission begins - with only one consumer rep.
Satel appointment to an advisory committee confirmed.
People's True Freedom Commission is launched!
by David Oaks, Director
Support Coalition International
PENTAGON CITY, WASHINGTON, DC: There we were yesterday in a ballroom of the
incredibly high-priced Ritz Carlton Hotel, not far from the Pentagon. We were
psychiatric survivors and disability leaders scattered throughout an audience of
100, watching in disbelief as the first meeting of the President's New Freedom
Commission on Mental Health began.
We were watching a triple play by President Bush against the entire
cross-disability movement, by targeting the most vulnerable: psychiatric
survivors and mental health consumers.
But this time we were not alone in standing up for our rights.
BUSH TRIPLE PLAY
1) We watched that morning as 15 Bush appointees on this mental health
commission introduced themselves, and only one identified himself or herself as
having personally experienced the mental health system, or as a leader of a
mental health consumer/psychiatric survivor organization.
2) During a break, we heard personally from Charlie Curie, administrator of the
US Substance Abuse/Mental Health Administration, that the appointment of
extremist psychiatrist Sally Satel to a key federal advisory role was a done
deal. Mr. Curie told us, "I support her appointment. The paper work had been
signed. The decision won't be changed." (Satel will be on the National Advisory
Council for the US Center for Mental Health Services, not to be confused with
the President's Commission.)
3) And the third part of the triple play: In the audience were hard-working
long-time leaders from each of the three federally-funded national technical
assistance centers for consumer/survivors. President Bush's reward for their
fight for true freedom? His budget promises 100 percent "termination" of all
funding for these centers in one year.
WE'RE BACK AT BAT AND WE'RE NOT ALONE!
By making public announcements during break times, by handing out our own news
release, and by individually talking to the Bush Commissioners, we made sure
everyone in that Ritz ballroom yesterday heard the news about the competition:
We announced the People's True Freedom Commission, created on June 14, 2002 by a
rapidly growing network of disability and psychiatric survivor/mental health
organizations. We made sure everyone at the President's Commision first meeting
had a copy of the speech made by Justin Dart at the first meeting of the
People's Commission. Justin is widely considered one of the main leaders of the
disability movement. He began the People's Commission launch by saying, "I
propose that we of the disability communities unite with all who love justice to
lead a revolution of empowerment." For background on the People's New Freedom
Commission, including the full text of Justin Dart's speech, see:
http://www.mindfreedom.org/mindfreedom/bush_c.shtml
Since that launch just five days ago, we are seeing unprecedented unity,
bridge building and calls for action in the consumer/survivor and disability
movements.
I learned something about federal meetings like the President's Commission,
which intends to hold meetings in various parts of the country over the next 11
months. They must be publicly announced and open to the public, except under
certain very-narrowly defined conditions. And during break times -- just before
the meeting, during breaks, and just after the meeting -- the First Amendment
kicks in.
So near the end of a break, as the audience and commissioners took their seats,
and just before chair Michael Hogan, PhD, re-started the meeting, I stood up and
addressed everyone. To his credit, Dr. Hogan let me complete my short speech.
I told everyone about the Bush triple play. I told them about how
cross-disability and mental health consumer and psychiatric survivor groups were
uniting. I told them about the People's True Freedom Commission.
And I pointed something out:
"If this was a President's commission about women's issues, imagine 14 of the 15
commissioners being men. Imagine the President had just appointed an openly
sexist man to another federal advisory committee on women. And imagine the
President also announced all federal funding for technical assistance for
women's organizations would be terminated in a year. This room would be filled
with nonviolent protesters today."
Judi Chamberlin, who is on the board of Support Coalition International, was
also there watching the disaster unfold at the Ritz Carlton yesterday. She was
of course disgusted. Judi told a media representative, "Back in 1979 President
Carter also had a blue ribbon commission. There was only one token psychiatric
survivor/mental health consumer on that commission, too. We're in the same
position 23 years later."
But there's a difference this time, Judi... We didn't fill the room with
nonviolent protesters yesterday, though I personally hope and pray we will some
day soon. But I felt a subtle difference in the air in that ballroom.
As I sat there in the ballroom feeling the deep insult of this triple play, Jim
Ward quietly took a seat next to me. Jim is director of the ADA Watch, which
unites 400 groups to defend the ADA. ADA Watch is a founding organization in the
People's Commission. Jim helped organize the People's Commission, and is himself
a psychiatric survivor. Jim said ADA Watch intends to participate in a news
event during the anniversary of the ADA, on July 26, 2002 about this crisis.
We're not alone this time.
And into the ballroom walks Tom Olin, from the Disability Rights Center in D.C.,
and one of the premiere photographers in any social change movement. Tom quietly
began to record and archive the events that day.
We're not alone this time.
During a break, a representative from the large International Association for
Psychosocial Rehabilitation expresses his concern, and he tells me IAPSRS would
be interested in being on the People's Commission.
We're not alone this time.
Members of the West Virginia Mental Health Consumers Association say "hi" and
tell me they're on board.
We're not alone this time.
And as the President's Commission starts I hear a familiar booming voice from
the other side of the audience, pointing out the irony that a meeting about one
of the poorest constituencies is held at the Ritz. "The rooms here are $300,"
says the voice. It's Joseph Rogers, director of the National Mental Health Self
Help Clearinghouse, on the People's Commission. During a break, Joseph
introduces me to a young law student who will help the People's Commission.
We're uniting this time.
As the Commissioners introduce themselves, we hear from one of the first "mental
health court" judges... we hear a Commissioner talk about the importance of
"compliance"... but we also hear Dan Fisher -- psychiatric survivor and
psychiatrist -- talk about empowerment and self-determination. We hear as he is
the only Commissioner to get a loud round of applause from from the audience.
We will be heard this time.
As I write this, Vicki Smith from MadNation in Canada tells me she is setting up
an e-mail list for the People's Commission. Vicki also pointed out how this Bush
triple play is an attack against the entire disability movement. President Bush
is supposed to have a commitment to "freedom" for all people diagnosed or
perceived as having disabilities. See the MadNation web site about the Bush
promises:
http://www.madnation.cc/issues/freedom/index.htm
These are the six points Bush promised for freedom for all people with
disabilities:
- Increasing Access to Assistive and Universally Designed Technologies
- Expanding Educational Opportunities
- Promoting Homeownership
- Integrating Americans with Disabilities into the Workforce
- Expanding Transportation Options
- Promoting Full Access to Community Life
Says Vicki, "We want assistive technology, homes of our own, employment, a
chance to go to school, transportation and full access to community life too.
These are our issues, but as the New Untouchables we are likely to get brain
damaging 'treatment,' mental health courts, and a federally sanctioned mental
health militia in the name of 'improved systems' instead."
We're taking strategic action this time.
As I write this, Lawrence Plumlee, MD is giving his public comment (copied
BELOW) to the President's Commission, on behalf of Support Coalition
International. In the three minutes allotted he planned to focus on lack of full
informed consent for people prescribed psychiatric drugs.
We will not be silent this time!

From "Lawrence A. Plumlee, MD" <laplumlee@pol.net>
Founder, National Capital Area Advocates Bethesda, Maryland
I'm Larry Plumlee, a graduate of Johns Hopkins Medical School and formerly on
the faculty there in the the Dept. of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
I've worked in toxicology for the U.S. Public Health Service and Environmental
Protection Agency. Today, I represent the Support Coalition International, a
coalition of 100 groups of psychiatric consumers and survivors.
We believe that consumers should have full disclosure about the risks of
proposed psychiatric treatments, and choice from a range of alternatives. We
want consumers to have informed consent, difficult as that may be to provide
during a time of crisis.
Many of our members choose drugs, others do not.
I'll read you a few abridged lines from the book _Mad in America_ by Robert
Whitaker that illustrate information which patients are not given:
"In 1967, NIMH investigators reported, much to their surprise, the patients
that had not been treated in hospitals with drugs 'were less likely to be
rehospitalized than those who received any of the three active phenothiazines.'
Four years later, NIMH physicians were back with another disturbing finding.
Relapse rates rose in direct correlation to initial drug dosage, and the
no-dosage group had by far the lowest relapse rate. Only 7 percent of patients
who weren't medicated at the start of the study relapsed, compared to 45
percent who were placed on neuroleptics then withdrawn."
Today we know that the risk of neuroleptics includes significant structural
brain change in the size and shape of the brain, as shown on MRI and CT scans.
Patients are not warned about this, and usually, not even about tardive
dyskinesia and dystonia.
The newer antidepressants of SSRI type carry a significant likelihood that
patients will be worse when they are stopped than they were before starting
them. Informed consent about this discontinuation syndrome is usually not being
provided to the patient before these drugs are recommended.
Thank you very much.

ACTION: Please forward and copy to all appropriate places on and off Internet,
thanks.