NAMI SCC Website

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home
About
Links
Search
Advocacy
Editorial
Experiences
News
Newsletters
People
Research
Recovery
Santa Cruz
Site Map
Guest Book

 

 

Children's Mental Health Site of the Month

 

 

 

Poor Hurt by Mental Health Cuts

Several decades ago, national and state advocates for people with 'catastrophic' psychiatric disabilities decried policies that routinely offered the least amount of service to those with the greatest mental health needs. Increasingly, over the past decade, those policies have been reversed, with people with 'high needs' being moved to the front of the line. Currently, state budget downturns in neighboring Massachusetts have had the opposite effect: depressed moms, struggling college kids and ex-cons in need are no longer eligible for free public mental health care and are being routinely referred to private mental healthcare providers.

Cuts end free mental help for many poor
By Ellen Barry, Boston Globe Staff, 9/9/2002

For decades, the state has supplied Boston's working poor with a mental safety valve: If they were overcome by depression, anxiety, or an explosive temper, they could walk into a community mental health center and walk away with a regular appointment for free therapy.

That service quietly disappeared this summer as part of a $13.8 million cut to the Department of Mental Health budget. Commissioner Marylou Sudders has given new orders to community health centers to provide free services only to people who are severely mentally ill, bypassing the pool of depressed mothers, recently released inmates, and illegal immigrants whose care has cost the state about $1.8 million a year.

About 800 people in Boston currently use the free therapy service. It is no longer accepting new clients, and the department's medical director, Kenneth Duckworth, said the affected people will be shifted gradually to private health-care providers, a process that has no deadline and could take many months.

The change, like the shuttering of a partial-hospitalization program in Quincy and a day-treatment program in the South End, has attracted little notice during a summer of gathering fiscal woes. But providers say successive budget cuts are not just fraying a safety net, they are removing it.

''The whole system of community care for people with mental illness is being dismantled, and the impact is going to last for generations,'' said Dr. Mary Ann Badaracco, chief of psychiatry at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.

Since August, clients who are not ill enough to be eligible - those who are suffering but functional, without debilitating psychiatric illnesses such as schizophrenia - have been referred to private hospitals that draw from the state's free-care pool, which funds health care for poor families.

But officials at those hospitals say that transition will be frustrating at best. Demand for psychiatric outpatient services, they say, already far outstrips supply, and such clients are likely to take their place at the end of long waiting lists.

''Right now we have about four referrals for every opening we have,'' said Dr. Jerrold Rosenbaum, chief of psychiatry at Massachusetts General Hospital. ''The idea that we could absorb more patients is just not the case.''

Many clients, faced with a list of private providers, are likely to abandon treatment altogether, said Sudders.

''My experience is what happens is people don't take the referrals,'' Sudders said. ''They say, `We will manage the best we can.'''

It was in the early 1960s, the age of the space race and the ''war on poverty,'' that John F. Kennedy signed a bill that would create a permanent framework of community mental-health care centers. In Massachusetts, unlike many other states, the network was developed almost to completion, but the initial mandate - to offer services to an unrestricted population - has been altered radically.

After years of budget cuts and waves of people removed from public mental hospitals, community health centers' resources are almost entirely devoted to clients with catastrophic mental illnesses such as schizophrenia, said Dr. Paul Appelbaum, chairman of psychiatry at University of Massachusetts Medical School.

''Many of the people who are not in the DMH-priority population are nonetheless very ill,'' he said. The shift away from their needs is ''ironic, given that many of them are somewhat more functional and the return to society from their treatment is likely to be greater than the severely mentally ill.''

Jason Potter, for example, credits mental-health services with keeping him in school. Two years ago, when his mother died, he was so frayed by grief and stress that he thought he might be forced to drop out of classes at the University of Massachusetts at Boston, surrendering his dream of attending law school.

Potter's family had grown up receiving public assistance - his mother was a home health aide and his father did odd jobs - and the blow of his mother's death broke his stride. He stopped sleeping and couldn't concentrate.

For two years, he's had a weekly appointment with a counselor at South End Community Health Center, paid for out of flexible funds supplied by the Department of Mental Health to the center.

Without the therapy sessions, ''I think I wouldn't be able to handle the stress. I wouldn't be able to function'' and likely would have dropped out of school, said Potter, who is 27. And, he said, most of the patients who have crossed his path at the center have similar problems.

''Most poor people have anger and depression,'' he said.

Ray Walden, the clinic's director and Potter's therapist, said he would eventually have to find a new funding source or refer Potter to a private hospital.

''I don't know how we're going to do it. This is a guy I've known for a long time,'' he said.

Since the budget cuts were announced, Laurie Goldman, a psychologist, has turned away several people who came into the South End center asking for therapy appointments. One man had recently been released from jail and was required to see a therapist as a condition of his parole - but he couldn't find one who would see him.

''This man was begging to be seen for therapy,'' Goldman said. Unable to help him, Goldman wrote a note to his parole officer explaining that the man had sincerely tried to arrange a therapy session.

Medicare and Medicaid cuts have thrust new work on local clinics, she said, and the additional burden of budget cuts put staff members in the ethically precarious position of turning needy clients away.

''I have worked with so many people who have tried to kill cats, who have tried to kill people,'' she said. ''What happens to the people who can't get seen is that they go off their medication. If they don't think it's going to have an effect on the wealthy people in the suburbs, think again.''

Ellen Barry can be reached at barry@globe.com.

Source: http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/252/metro/Cuts_end_free_mental_help_for_many_poorP.shtml


This "Mental Health E-News" posting is a service of the New York Ass'n of Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services, a statewide coalition of people who use and/or provide community mental health services dedicated to improving services and social conditions for people with psychiatric disabilities by promoting their recovery, rehabilitation and rights.
To join our list, e-mail us your request and, where appropriate, the name of your organization to NYAPRS@aol.com.

Last Updated on 02/20/2005   webmaster@namiscc.org

Home About Links Search Advocacy Editorial Experiences News Newsletters People Research Recovery Santa Cruz Site Map Guest Book

Opinions expressed in this web site do not necessarily reflect the views of NAMI Santa Cruz County, NAMI California or any affiliated organizations.  We attempt to present a balanced perspective on issues by presenting multiple viewpoints.

Copyright 2005 National Alliance for the Mentally Ill Santa Cruz County, All Rights Reserved.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted (©) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml  If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.