NAMI SCC Website

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home
About
Links
Search
Advocacy
Editorial
Experiences
News
Newsletters
People
Research
Recovery
Santa Cruz
Site Map
Guest Book

 

 

Children's Mental Health Site of the Month

 

 

DNC Critiques Bush's Medicare Proposal


DEMOCRATIC NEWS

For Immediate Release
August 6, 2002

Contact: Jennifer Palmieri, 202-863-8148
Becky Ogle, 202-256-7208


Bush's New Freedom Equals a "little freedom" for Americans with Disabilities on Medicare

Washington, D.C. -- Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chairman Terry McAuliffe today called President Bush's recently-issued "homebound" Medicare policy changes misguided, inadequate and simply rhetorical.

"President Bush used the backdrop of the 12th anniversary of the most important civil rights legislation for people with disabilities, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), to again put out false promises to people with disabilities," McAuliffe said.

Last Friday, President Bush said that Medicare home health beneficiaries should be given a "little freedom" in order to "occasionally take part in their communities without fear of losing their benefits." Currently the home health homebound rule in Medicare is being used to incarcerate thousands of people with permanent disabilities and serious health conditions in their home each day in order to receive the home health care they need to sustain their lives.

When Medicare was enacted thirty years ago, the homebound rule made perfect sense for determining who needed the benefit. But in today's technologically advanced world, the homebound rule is unfair, intrusive and overly proscriptive for people with the most significant disabilities, similar to the President's recently released instructions. In fact, the new program instruction to home health agencies and Medicare carriers is even more restrictive than the already overly restrictive homebound definition. It cites specific examples of how beneficiaries can participate in their communities, but these examples do more harm than good. A beneficiary should be able to leave home to attend college, go to the movies, or go out to dinner, yet none of these activities are on the new Medicare list. These exclusions obviously imply that they are not allowed.

For people like David Jayne, the founder of the National Coalition to Amend the Medicare Homebound Restriction, a man with advanced ALS, or people who have late stage MS and severe spinal cord injuries who must receive home health services for the rest of their lives, the rule is damaging to their quality of life. Nationally, roughly forty-six thousand beneficiaries are estimated to need skilled home health care for a year or more due to their disability or chronic illness.

"President Bush's so-called New Program Instruction is no different than his 'New Freedom Initiative.' It is full of rhetorical promises and false claims," McAuliffe continued. "The Bush administration's clarification of Medicare policy is even more restrictive than the existing restrictive homebound definition."

"Once again, I call on the President---and Congress---to deliver 'Real Freedoms' to people with disabilities, not Bush's version of 'New Freedoms.'"

www.democrats.org

###
 

Home About Links Search Advocacy Editorial Experiences News Newsletters People Research Recovery Santa Cruz Site Map Guest Book

Opinions expressed in this web site do not necessarily reflect the views of NAMI Santa Cruz County, NAMI California or any affiliated organizations.  We attempt to present a balanced perspective on issues by presenting multiple viewpoints.

Copyright 2005 National Alliance for the Mentally Ill Santa Cruz County, All Rights Reserved.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted (©) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml  If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.