NAMI SCC Website

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home
About
Links
Search
Advocacy
Editorial
Experiences
News
Newsletters
People
Research
Recovery
Santa Cruz
Site Map
Guest Book

 

 

Children's Mental Health Site of the Month

 

 

AAPD Joins Lawsuit Against HHS

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Andrew J. Imparato
(202) 457-0046

AAPD JOINS MEDICARE LAWSUIT AGAINST U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (HHS)

Organizations and Individuals Seek to Enforce Right to Appeal Medicare Ruling on Treatment for Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)

WASHINGTON, DC, August 6, 2002 - The American Association of People with Disabilities (AAPD) has joined as a plaintiff in a lawsuit challenging the failure of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to implement an appeals process for Medicare National Coverage Determinations (NCDs) as required by Congress. Other plaintiffs are the American Council of the Blind (ACB) and the Gray Panthers, along with Medicare beneficiaries Lois Jalbert, Robert Kennell and Barbara McAuliffe. The lawsuit was filed this morning in federal court and announced at a press conference at the National Press Club in Washington, DC.

"This lawsuit is important not only for individuals who have age-related macular degeneration (AMD), but also for everyone," said Andrew J. Imparato, AAPD President and CEO of AAPD. "The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services must be held accountable and must implement a process whereby beneficiaries can challenge national coverage decisions denying medically necessary treatments to the millions of people who rely on Medicare for health coverage. The failure of the Administration to provide for this kind of basic due process is an insult to all Medicare beneficiaries and will not be tolerated."

The national coverage decision challenged in the lawsuit is the March decision by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to deny Medicare coverage of ocular photodynamic therapy (OPT) with verteporfin ("Visudyne") -- the only effective treatment for age-related macular degeneration with occult lesions. In the absence of this treatment elderly Americans with the condition lose their vision. The decision to deny coverage reversed an October 2001 announcement by HHS Secretary Tommy Thompson that Medicare would pay for the treatment.

The Medicare, Medicaid and SCHIP Benefits and Improvement Act of 2000 (BIPA) became law in December 2000 with overwhelming support of Congress and President Clinton. Section 522 of BIPA created a new right for "any aggrieved party" to challenge a Medicare National Coverage Decision (NCD). An NCD is a determination by HHS with respect to whether or not a particular item or service is covered nationally by Medicare. Under Section 522, once an aggrieved party challenges an unfavorable NCD the decision "shall be reviewed by the Departmental Appeals Board of the Department of Health and Human Services." Congress mandated that Section 522 take effect and apply to any NCD made on or after October 1, 2001.

Nearly a year after the congressionally-imposed deadline for compliance with BIPA, however, HHS has failed to implement the appeals process. As a result, beneficiaries continue to be denied their right to appeal. When plaintiffs Jalbert, Kennell and McAuliffe tried to appeal HHS's decision to not cover Visudyne therapy, their appeals were sidelined until an appeals process is in place. Unfortunately, people with AMD cannot afford to wait. The disease, whose causes are not yet well understood, can progress quickly and result in such dramatic vision loss that a person can become legally blind soon after an initial diagnosis.

"We're dealing with a very basic bodily function here" said Charles Crawford, Executive Director of the American Council of the Blind. "This treatment is critical. HHS's reversal means that people who can afford to pay for the treatment out of their own pockets will retain their sight. People who cannot pay for it will go blind. It's nothing short of an outrage when the agency set up to provide for health care won't even hear the simple request for reconsideration of a decision that puts the eyesight of the Medicare eligible elderly on the chopping block of administrative arrogance."

To compel HHS to implement Section 522 of BIPA, Plaintiffs are suing HHS and CMS, seeking a writ of mandamus as well as preliminary injunctive relief. "Congress recognized the need for Medicare beneficiaries to be able to challenge the policies that affect them," said Grant P. Bagley of Arnold & Porter, Counsel for the Plaintiffs. "It is time for HHS to implement the process Congress created. We welcome the opportunity to fight to protect this important beneficiary right."



The American Association of People with Disabilities (AAPD) is a national membership organization dedicated to promoting the economic and political empowerment of all people with disabilities; educating businesses and the general public about disability issues; and providing membership benefits, like financial services and product discounts. AAPD was founded in 1995 by a group of cross-disability leaders to help unite the diverse community of people with disabilities, including their family, friends and supporters, and to be a national voice for change in implementing the goals of the Americans with Disabilities Act: equality of opportunity, full participation, independent living and economic self-sufficiency.

 

horizontal rule


JUSTICE FOR ALL -- A Service of the American Association of People with Disabilities
www.aapd-dc.org www.jfanow.org

There's strength in numbers! Be a part of a national coalition of people with disabilities and join AAPD today.
www.aapd-dc.org



 

Home About Links Search Advocacy Editorial Experiences News Newsletters People Research Recovery Santa Cruz Site Map Guest Book

Opinions expressed in this web site do not necessarily reflect the views of NAMI Santa Cruz County, NAMI California or any affiliated organizations.  We attempt to present a balanced perspective on issues by presenting multiple viewpoints.

Copyright 2005 National Alliance for the Mentally Ill Santa Cruz County, All Rights Reserved.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted (©) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml  If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.