NAMI SCC Website

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home
About
Links
Search
Advocacy
Editorial
Experiences
News
Newsletters
People
Research
Recovery
Santa Cruz
Site Map
Guest Book

 

 

Children's Mental Health Site of the Month

 

 

_________________________________________________________________________
E-News June 17, 2003 Vol. 02-30
_________________________________________________________________________

Legislation Would Weaken State Mental Illness Insurance Parity

House Association Health Plan Legislation Would Weaken State Mental Illness
Insurance Parity Laws!

Later this week the U.S. House of Representatives will consider legislation to
vastly expand multi-employer Association Health Plans (AHPs) and undermine
existing state laws that require health plans to cover treatment for mental
illness on the same terms and conditions as all other illnesses - commonly
referred to as parity. This proposal (HR 660) would significantly expand the
scope of a federal law (known as ERISA), that exempts self-insured employer
health plans from state regulation. By expanding ERISA, HR 660 would encourage
employers that currently offer health plans for their workers (and their
families) to switch away from coverage that meets a parity standard, i.e. plans
that cover mental illnesses the same as all other illnesses.

The AHPs envisioned by HR 660 would be exempt from all state insurance laws,
including: state parity laws, minimum coverage standards for mental illness
treatment and other consumer protections. The supporters of AHPs assert that
HR 660 would help make employer coverage more affordable and ease the growth
among the uninsured. However, several recent studies have found that AHPs are
not effective in reaching uninsured workers and their families and are more
likely to fail as a result of insolvency.

ACTION REQUESTED

NAMI advocates are strongly encouraged to contact their House member to urge
them to oppose HR 660. Remind your House member that this well-intentioned
legislation would have enormous negative consequences for workers and their
families. In NAMI's view, HR 660 would:
* severely undermine the effectiveness of the 34 state mental illness insurance
parity laws,
* fail to address the problem of the uninsured - studies demonstrate that most
employers that would switch to AHP coverage already provide coverage on their
own, and
* place workers and their families at risk of losing coverage - studies show
that AHPs have a long history of plan failures and insolvency (AHPs would not
have to meet current solvency and reserve standards enforced by state insurance
commissioners).

All House members can be reached by calling the Capitol Switchboard toll free
at 1-800-839-5276 or at 202-224-3121 or online through www.congress.org.

-----------------------------------------------------------
The NAMI E-News is an electronic newsletter delivering
the latest in federal action alerts, legislative and policy
updates, and NAMI press releases. Provided free of charge
as a public service, the NAMI E-News is read by more than
16,500 NAMI members, policymakers, federal and state
legislators, media, providers, health care policy experts, and
others interested in improving the lives of individuals with severe
mental illnesses and their families.

Contributions to support the NAMI E-News are welcomed and
can be made online ( http://www.nami.org/about/development/index.html );
via mail (make check payable to NAMI and send to NAMI, P.O. Box 79972,
Baltimore, MD 21279-0972); or through the Combined Federal Campaign
(CFC #0538).

Currently, NAMI Members number 220,000.

Thank you.

Last Updated on 04/14/04   webmaster@namiscc.org

Home About Links Search Advocacy Editorial Experiences News Newsletters People Research Recovery Santa Cruz Site Map Guest Book

Opinions expressed in this web site do not necessarily reflect the views of NAMI Santa Cruz County, NAMI California or any affiliated organizations.  We attempt to present a balanced perspective on issues by presenting multiple viewpoints.

Copyright 2005 National Alliance for the Mentally Ill Santa Cruz County, All Rights Reserved.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted (©) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml  If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.