NAMI SCC Website

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home
About
Links
Search
Advocacy
Editorial
Experiences
News
Newsletters
People
Research
Recovery
Santa Cruz
Site Map
Guest Book

 

 

Children's Mental Health Site of the Month

 

 

Study: Most States Cut Medicaid Funding

By LAURA MECKLER The Associated Press January 13, 2003

WASHINGTON (AP) - States facing tight budgets and growing Medicaid costs are cutting back on prescription drugs and dental care while increasing co-payments for people who use the program, an independent study released Monday says.

The study found that all states except Alabama have cut spending or plan to cut spending this year on Medicaid, the health insurance program that serves 42 million poor, disabled and elderly Americans. That includes 32 states that made cuts when the fiscal year began last summer and have found it necessary to cut yet again.

``For most states, there aren't any easy solutions left,'' said Diane Rowland, executive director of the Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, which released the study.

Based on a 50-state survey, her group found that 45 states plan tighter controls on payments for prescription drugs, 37 states plan to reduce or freeze payments to doctors and hospitals, 27 states plan to restrict eligibility for the program, 25 states plan to cut benefits such as dental or vision care and 17 states plan to increase co-payments required of beneficiaries.

That's on top of similar cuts made last year.

On average, Medicaid spending is projected to grow by 9 percent this year, almost twice as fast as legislatures assumed when writing their 2003 budgets, the survey found.

Overall, states are facing massive budget shortfalls totaling at least $60 billion going into the next fiscal year. Medicaid makes up an average of 15 percent of state budgets.

Legislation introduced last week would provide $10 billion immediately to help states with Medicaid costs. A similar bill, sponsored by Sens. Susan Collins, R-Maine, and Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., was approved easily last year by the Senate but never passed the House.

During the fiscal crisis of the early 1990s, states were more willing to cut spending on education and to raise taxes than they are now, which puts Medicaid at particular risk, said John Holahan of the Urban Institute, who authored a companion study looking in depth at seven states.

In addition, in the early '90s, states had one-time options that are no longer available, such as funneling patients into cost-saving managed care plans.

Cutting Medicaid spending is particularly painful for states because the program is financed jointly by state and federal governments. That means states forgo federal money with every Medicaid dollar they cut from state budgets.

Medicaid covers 30 million people in low-income families, including one in five U.S. children. It also provides health and nursing home payments for 7 million people with disabilities and supplements Medicare for 6 million elderly living in poverty.

While most beneficiaries are children and their parents, the bulk of the money is spent on the elderly and disabled.
------------------------

N.Y. urged to take cue from business to hold down health care, drug costs
By BRIAN McGUIRE Schenectady Daily Gazette Reporter January 14, 2003

ALBANY - Seniors reeling from the high cost of prescription drugs are not likely to find relief until New York implements a plan that excludes certain drugs and charges higher premiums to higher-income clients, the director of a Washington-based philanthropy told legislators and lobbyists at the state Capitol Monday.

Speaking at a panel organized by the AFL-CIO task force on prescription drugs, Heinz Family Philanthropies Executive Director Jeffrey Lewis outlined a plan for affordable, universal prescription drug coverage for seniors that he said would help solve the problem of escalating drug costs and its corollary - a rising number of uninsured New Yorkers - by consolidating the state agencies that administer health care and by developing a list of "preferred drugs" from which clients may choose.

"My recommendations focus on the needs of the state," Lewis said by phone from a hotel room in New York City last night.

"I would recommend that New York apply a business model to the public sector."
Lewis has been in conversation with the United Federation of Teachers since
Massachusetts' implementation in 2002 of the Heinz plan to Overcome Prescription drug Expenses, or HOPE.

That plan made Massachusetts the first state in the country to offer universal prescription drug coverage to residents 65 years old and older. As the legislature prepares to deal with a deficit of several billion dollars, many lawmakers are looking at cuts to health care as a way to close the gap.

Joseph Glazer, president of the Mental Health Association of New York, said he was not familiar with the Heinz proposal but warned against plans that limited the types of drugs available to patients.
"You're not talking about the difference between Tums and Rolaids," Glazer said.

But Lewis said his analysis would allow for a government to make all drugs available to patients with mental illness. "It may mean saving $50 million instead of $100 million," Lewis said.

"But at least people would know why they weren't saving as much money."

Legislators will be considering changes to the state's existing prescription drug plan, EPIC, in the upcoming legislative session.

Gov. Pataki's spokesman, Joe Conway, did not respond to requests about the Massachusetts plan in time for this article.

The U.S. Supreme Court is currently considering two cases that will determine whether drug makers can be forced to lower prices for the uninsured. Lawyers for the pharmaceutical industry are already lobbying to block the measures, arguing that health care decisions should be decided at the federal level.

Source: http://www.dailygazette.com/business.shtml#story03E00005

This 'Mental Health E-News' posting is a service of the New York Ass'n of Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services, a statewide coalition of people who use and/or provide community mental health services dedicated to improving services and social conditions for people with psychiatric disabilities by promoting their recovery, rehabilitation and rights.

To join our list, e-mail us your request and, where appropriate, the name of your organization to NYAPRS@aol.com.

 

Last Updated on 04/14/04   webmaster@namiscc.org

Home About Links Search Advocacy Editorial Experiences News Newsletters People Research Recovery Santa Cruz Site Map Guest Book

Opinions expressed in this web site do not necessarily reflect the views of NAMI Santa Cruz County, NAMI California or any affiliated organizations.  We attempt to present a balanced perspective on issues by presenting multiple viewpoints.

Copyright 2005 National Alliance for the Mentally Ill Santa Cruz County, All Rights Reserved.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted (©) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml  If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.