|
| Beautiful Minds can be Recovered The following inspiring piece in yesterday's New York Times comes from Dr. Courtenay Harding, internationally acclaimed researcher on recovery from schizophrenia who will, along with colleagues Drs. William Anthony and Patricia Deegan, will be delivering the September 12 post-lunch keynote at this year's NYAPRS 20th Annual Conference celebration. In this piece, Harding cites the results from her landmark 30-year study on the extraordinary impact of recovery-focused, rehabilitation-centered treatment received by the former back wards residents of a 1950's Vermont state hospital. By COURTENAY M. HARDING New York Times OP
ED BOSTON The film "A Beautiful Mind," about the Nobel Prize-winning mathematician John F. Nash Jr., portrays his recovery from schizophrenia as hard-won, awe-inspiring and unusual. What most Americans and even many psychiatrists do not realize is that many people with schizophrenia perhaps more than half do significantly improve or recover. That is, they can function socially, work, relate well to others and live in the larger community. Many can be symptom-free without medication. They improve without fanfare and frequently without much help from the mental health system. Many recover because of sheer persistence at fighting to get better, combined with family or community support. Though some shake off the illness in two to five years, others improve much more slowly. Yet people have recovered even after 30 or 40 years with schizophrenia. The question is, why haven't we set up systems of care that encourage many more people with schizophrenia to reclaim their lives? We have known what to do and how to do it since the mid-1950's. George Brooks, clinical director of a Vermont hospital, was using thorazine, then a new drug, to treat patients formerly dismissed as hopeless. He found that for many, the medication was not enough to allow them to leave the hospital. Collaborating with patients, he developed a comprehensive and flexible program of psychosocial rehabilitation. The hospital staff helped patients develop social and work skills, cope with daily living and regain confidence. After a few months in this program, many of the patients who hadn't responded to medication alone were well enough to go back to their communities. The hospital also built a community system to help patients after they were discharged. These results were lasting. In the 1980's, when the patients who had been through this program in the 50's were contacted for a University of Vermont study, 62 percent to 68 percent were found to be significantly improved from their original condition or to have completely recovered. The most amazing finding was that 45 percent of all those in Dr. Brooks's program no longer had signs or symptoms of any mental illness three decades later. Today, most of the 2.5 million Americans with schizophrenia do not get the kind of care that worked so well in Vermont. Instead, they are treated in community mental health centers that provide medication which works to reduce painful symptoms in about 60 percent of cases and little else. There is rarely enough money for truly effective rehabilitation programs that help people manage their lives. Unfortunately, psychiatrists and others who care for the mentally ill are often trained from textbooks written at the turn of the last century the most notable by two European doctors: Emil Kraepelin in Germany and Eugen Bleuler in Switzerland. These books state flatly that improvement and recovery are not to be expected. Kraepelin worked in back wards that simply warehoused patients, including some in the final stages of syphilis who were wrongly diagnosed with schizophrenia. Bleuler, initially more optimistic, revised his prognoses downward after studying only hospitalized patients samples of convenience rather than including patients who were ultimately discharged. The American Psychiatric Association's newest Diagnostic and Statistical Manual D.S.M.-IV, published in 1994 repeats this old pessimism. Reinforcing this gloomy view are the crowded day rooms and shelters and large public mental-health caseloads. Also working against effective treatment are destructive social forces like prejudice, discrimination and poverty, as well as overzealous cost containment in public and private insurance coverage. Public dialogue is mostly about ensuring that people take their medication, with little said about providing ways to return to productive lives. We promote a self-fulfilling prophecy of a downward course and then throw up our hands and blame the ill person, or the illness itself, as not remediable. In addition to the Vermont study, nine other contemporary research studies from across the world have all found that over decades, the number of those improving and even recovering from schizophrenia gets larger and larger. These long-term, in-depth studies followed people for decades, whether or not they remained in treatment, and found that 46 percent to 68 percent showed significant improvement or had recovered. Earlier research had been short-term and had looked only at patients in treatment. Although there are many pathways to recovery, several factors stand out. They include a home, a job, friends and integration in the community. They also include hope, relearned optimism and self-sufficiency. Treatment based on the hope of recovery has had periodic support. In 1961 a report of the American Medical Association, the American Psychiatric Association, the American Academy of Neurology and the Justice Department said, "The fallacies of total insanity, hopelessness and incurability should be attacked and the prospects of recovery and improvement though modern concepts of treatment and rehabilitation emphasized." In 1984, the National Institute of Mental Health recommended community support programs that try to bolster patients' sense of personal dignity and encourage self-determination, peer support and the involvement of families and communities. Now there are renewed calls for recovery-oriented treatment. They should be heeded. We need major shifts in actual practice. Can all patients make the improvement of a John Nash? No. Schizophrenia is not one disease with one cause and one treatment. But we, as a society, should recognize a moral imperative to listen to what science has told us since 1955 and what patients told us long before. Many mentally ill people have the capacity to lead productive lives in full citizenship. We should have the courage to provide that opportunity for them. Courtenay M. Harding is a senior director of the Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation at Boston University's Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences. Source: NY Times
The following followup to Dr. Courtenay Harding's OP ED piece to the NY Times that was posted on this list yesterday comes from Steve Coe, the executive director for NYAPRS member agency, Community Access: To the Editor: Courtenay Hardings March 10 column, "Beautiful Minds Can Be Reclaimed," clearly articulates what many in the public mental health community know to be true. Its now time for government funding systems to catch up with the most effective treatment models available (i.e., highly successful recovery-oriented models--like the ones Dr. Harding studied--that emphasize self-determination and peer support). Unfortunately, the financial incentives built into current Medicaid regulations (which finances 95% of the public mental health system) favor models that reward providers for chalking up high numbers of face-to-face visits with clinic-based psychiatrists. We should instead be directing our public mental health dollars toward community-based models that help people with mental illness explore job opportunities, return to school, and build a social network outside of the mental health system; models which, as of now, receive only scant financial support compared to clinic-based, Medicaid-funded programs. State and federal mental health officials need to overhaul antiquated Medicaid regulations as soon as possible so people with mental illness can finally end their "careers" as professional mental patients and begin lives as productive citizens in our community. Sincerely, Steve Coe
This "Mental Health E-News" posting is a service of the New York Ass'n of Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services, a statewide coalition of people who use and/or provide community mental health services dedicated to improving services and social conditions for people with psychiatric disabilities by promoting their recovery, rehabilitation and rights. To join our list, e-mail us your request and, where appropriate, the name of your organization to NYAPRS@aol.com. Save these dates! September 10 - 13, 2002 NYAPRS 20th Annual Conference
Celebration contact: Mary McLaughlin, NYAPRS, 1 Columbia Place Albany, NY 12207 (518) 436-0008; fax: (518) 436-0044 |
|
Opinions expressed in this web site do not necessarily reflect the views of NAMI Santa Cruz County, NAMI California or any affiliated organizations. We attempt to present a balanced perspective on issues by presenting multiple viewpoints. Copyright 2005 National Alliance for the Mentally Ill Santa Cruz County, All Rights Reserved. FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted (©) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. |
