NAMI SCC Website

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Guest Book
Home
About
HELP
Search
Site Map
Links
Advocacy
Events
Experiences
News
Newsletters
Opinion
People
Recovery
Research
Santa Cruz

 

Children's Mental Health Site of the Month

 

 

 

New Books 

Madness: A Brief History
Roy Porter

Joanna Griffiths
Observer

Sunday February 10, 2002

OUP £11.99, pp241

Roy Porter ends his short history of madness with a teasing question: 'Is Folly jingling its bells again?' More people 'are said to be suffering - indeed claiming to be suffering - from a proliferation of psychiatric syndromes, in a "victim culture" in which benefits may appear to lie in buying into psychiatric paradigms.' Madness is no longer the domain of the witch, the religious seer, or the poetic genius; it is now - as neurosis, trauma, anxiety - the domain of nearly everybody. Those who profess themselves to be unencumbered by mental fragility are seen to be as untrustworthy as the gibbering lunatics of Bedlam, who claimed they were sane.

Full text

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4353023,00.html

horizontal rule

Whores of the Court - The Fraud of Psychiatric Testimony and the Rape of American Justice (1997) by Margaret Hagen, Ph.D psychologist.

horizontal rule

MAD IN AMERICA - Bad Science, Bad Medicine and the Enduring Mistreatment of the Mentally Ill (2001) By Robert Whitaker

reviewed by the 'Spinster Librarian' [Suzanne Rush]

http://www.boyaremyarmstired.com/spinster.html

Review:

Everything the general public believes about the causes and remedies for mental illness — specifically schizophrenia — is based on shoddy science and is likely false. That is the message of noted science journalist and author Robert Whitaker, in his book, "Mad in America; Bad Science, Bad Medicine and the Enduring Mistreatment of the Mentally Ill."

Whitaker's book, based on comprehensive research culled from old patient medical records, historical accounts and government freedom of information documents, paints a harsh picture of the mistreatment of mental patients from the beginning of the 19th century to the care prescribed by today's psychiatrists.

His historical perspective begins with the description of "cures" from the late 1700s and early 1800s like the tranquilizer chair, to which those suffering from madness were strapped, immobilized, hooded and doused with icy water. Drowning therapy was another early favorite. Here the subject "was enclosed in a coffin-like box with holes, [and] was lowered by means of a well-sweep [into water]. He was kept there until bubbles of air cease to rise, then was taken out, rubbed and revived." The thinking about this therapy being that after experiencing near-death the patient could re-evaluate his life and fly right.

In contrast, the York Quakers of Pennsylvania tried more humane methods, a philosophy they dubbed, "moral treatment." They saw the mentally ill as "brethren" who needed gentleness, respect and good food. They opened a home in 1796 with beautiful gardens, game rooms and nighttime entertainment.

Their success rate in curing those who had suffered psychotic breaks ran about 70%. Moral treatment was a method that lasted for most of that century, but by the end of the 1900s, the general adoption of Francis

Eugenics was the belief that both desirable and undesirable human traits were bequeathed and not the result of environmental conditions. "By 1914, forty-four colleges in America has introduced eugenics into their curriculums, with the subject taught as a science... Even the august

The groundwork had been laid for American society to view moral and physical infirmities from an unforgiving perspective. So begins the litany of modern abuses heaped upon the impotent insane. This was the era that saw the beginning of large-scale asylum building to segregate those who were seen as unfit to participate in society and who must not, at any cost, reproduce. Sterilization, without consent, was a powerful tool to rid society of the impure, and was practiced without regard to the rights or wishes of the confined.

But castration and clitorectomies would not rid the mind of impure thoughts. Once segregated, a number of new methods were employed to "help" psychotics, depressives and those who by lack of wealth or power found themselves incarcerated. Insulin coma treatment was one such therapy — one that caused grand mal seizures that would damage the brain in such a way that the patient would become drooling and docile. This led to electroshock therapy, another permanently damaging regimen to subdue the ill. Finally, this line of care led to lobotomy. Lobotomies of the frontal lobe produced the same effects as the other brain-damaging therapies, but more quickly.

Psychiatrists in charge of the mentally ill felt justified in using any toxic method to make their wards more pliable for their long-term care. That is probably why, after WWII, neuroleptic drugs that inflicted a whole host of virulent side effects, were introduced, misrepresented and lauded. These drugs, of which thorazine is the most commonly known, cause a blockage of dopamine to the brain, which it was postulated, would help schizophrenics eliminate psychotic episodes.

In reality, thorazine and other neuroleptics caused serious damage to the brain and body in addition to blocking the dopamine receptors.

Parkinson-like symptoms appeared in almost all patients who were prescribed these drugs. But the list of side effects is long and harrowing. "Evidence of the harm caused by the drugs was simply allowed to pile up and up, then pushed away in the corner where it wouldn't be seen." Still the drugs were touted as "insulin for the insane." It was said that neuroleptic drugs used daily would help schizophrenics maintain mental health, live regular lives and keep them out of state institutions which were increasingly losing government funding as the century came to a close.

If the drugs had actually kept patients free from delusions, allowed them to function, or even kept them pain-free, perhaps the brain-damaging effects could have been justified. But not only did these drugs have low rates of success in returning the insane to society as functioning citizens, they instead turned a whole population into veritable zombies. The ugliness didn't end there. As "Boston Globe" journalist, Whitaker, recounts with evidence culled from the FDA, medical journals, and the records from clinical trials, the drug-makers knew all along that the drugs were  not effective.

The stories of corrupted "double-blind" studies, drug money influencing doctors and psychiatrists and the unrelenting disregard of the afflicted, are harrowing. The book brings us up to date with it discussion of the newest "wonder" drugs, the atypicals, notably clozapine. This modern drug, based once again on the unproven hypothesis that psychosis is caused by the dopamine receptors in the brain, produces many neurotoxic effects — "seizures, dense sedation, marked drooling, rare sudden death, constipation, urinary incontinence and weight gain." Try to get a job, or return to normal society with those symptoms.

Ultimately, what the book reveals is that neither doctors nor drug makers know what causes psychosis, their drugs do little but turn humans into incompetent animatrons and that most of what the public has been led to believe about the marvels of modern drug therapy is a hideous sham.

Furthermore, studies done during the end of the twentieth century by the World Health Organization in Africa, and others done in California by the National Institute of Mental Health, show that patients who are never given neuroleptics have much higher rates of recovery than those who are medicated.

"Mad in America," exposes and debunks our deepest-held societal beliefs about the mentally ill, which have been fed primarily by the publicity and money machine that is the pharmaceutical industry. As Robert Whitaker says, "The day will come when people will look back at our current medicines for schizophrenia and the stories we tell to patients about their abnormal brain chemistry, and they will shake their heads in utter disbelief."

Perhaps society has been willing to separate and isolate the insane because it has been too frightening to see them for who they are: us, on a very bad day. If even half of what this book purports is true, the time is nigh for the human race to return to the ideals of the Quaker's moral treatment for our mentally ill. It wouldn't hurt to treat the sane with compassion as well.

 

Home Alerts Experiences News Recovery Research Editorial Links Site Map Search Santa Cruz Guest Book

Opinions expressed in this web site do not necessarily reflect the views of NAMI Santa Cruz County, NAMI California or any affiliated organizations.  We attempt to present a balanced perspective on issues by presenting multiple viewpoints.

Copyright 2005 National Alliance for the Mentally Ill Santa Cruz County, All Rights Reserved.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted (©) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml  If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.