|
|
Update
on AB 1421 June 3, 2002: On June 12, AB 1421 will be heard by the Senate Health and Human Services Committee. It passed the Assembly by a huge majority. Click here for more information. Friday, June 22, 2001: The
California Senate budget committee has approved a $102 billion state budget
which scales back new funding for education, health and foster care, including
eliminating funding for AB 1421. On Friday, June 22, Assemblywoman Helen Thomson
withdrew her bill, AB 1421 for consideration this year with the following
statement: "Yesterday,
the Senate members of the budget conference committee voted down funding for AB
1421, my legislation to establish a limited program for Assisted Outpatient
Treatment for the severely mentally ill who refuse treatment. AB 1421 had
already passed the Assembly by a 65-1 vote. Accordingly, the Assembly
budget conferees proposed $10 million in funding for the intensive outpatient
treatment services required by the bill. But Senators refused to concur. The Santa Cruz Mental Health Client Action Network has indicated opposition to this bill due to the lack of adequate funding for community services and mental health programs, as indicated in the following letter, recently sent to Senator Deborah Ortiz: June 11, 2001 Dear
Senator Ortiz: I
fear that there is not money available in California at this time to support the
kind of active outreach and intensive service coordination to implement AB 1421.
Without a good case management, peer support and a therapeutic
coordination I don’t feel that the Involuntary Outpatient Commitment can work. Recent
research (Psychiatric Services 52:325-329, 200l and American Journal
of Psychiatry 156:1968-1975, 1999) both state the need for outpatient
commitment had no clear benefit unless it was sustained for at least six months
and accompanied by high-intensity community services and supports. During
the 1970’s and 1980’s I saw the closures of many long-term mental health
facilities. There was to be high
intensity community services attached to these closures.
This idea didn’t fail; it was not carried to the end.
These closures merely released many mentally ill persons to the street
with little or no follow up care. From
personal experience I have seen these people in homeless shelters or totally
isolated on the streets. I do not
want to see this bill passed without the necessary follow up care. Sincerely, <name deleted>
|
|
Opinions expressed in this web site do not necessarily reflect the views of NAMI Santa Cruz County, NAMI California or any affiliated organizations. We attempt to present a balanced perspective on issues by presenting multiple viewpoints. Copyright 2005 National Alliance for the Mentally Ill Santa Cruz County, All Rights Reserved. FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted (©) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. |